Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials.

R J Hayes1, S Bennett

  • 1MRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK.

International Journal of Epidemiology
|May 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of socioeconomic status and remoteness of residence on pregnancy outcome in major congenital heart disease: mediation analysis.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2026
Same author

Tocilizumab provides a potential therapeutic option for the management of hyperhaemolysis syndrome in sickle cell disease: A case series and brief narrative overview of the literature.

Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England)·2025
Same author

The association between cirrhosis and outcomes among female patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer in Ontario: a population-based study.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2025
Same author

Contamination effects in cluster randomised trials of TB interventions.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2025
Same author

Strong Association Between HIV Incidence and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in Zambia and South Africa: Prospective Data From the HPTN 071 (PopART) Trial.

Open forum infectious diseases·2025
Same author

High speed single pixel imaging using a microLED-on-CMOS light projector.

Optics express·2024
Same journal

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

From the departing Editors in Chief.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Data Resource Profile: Cheeloo Lifespan Electronic-health reseArch Data-library (Cheeloo LEAD).

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Cluster-randomized trials require specific sample size calculations accounting for community variation. This study offers simple formulas and guidance for epidemiologists to determine appropriate sample sizes for various health intervention studies.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health Research

Background:

  • Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are vital for evaluating health interventions at community levels.
  • Accurate sample size calculations in CRTs are challenging due to the need to account for between-cluster variation.
  • Field epidemiologists require accessible guidance for these complex sample size computations.

Observation:

  • This paper presents simplified formulas for sample size determination in both unmatched and pair-matched CRTs.
  • The methods accommodate various outcome measures, including rates per person-year, proportions, and means.
  • Formulas are presented using the coefficient of variation, with guidance on estimating this parameter.

Findings:

  • The study provides practical tools for sample size calculation in CRTs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The methods are applicable to diverse health intervention evaluations.
  • Case studies demonstrate the application of these formulas in real-world scenarios.

    • Implications:

    • Enhanced accessibility to sample size calculation methods for CRTs.
    • Improved design and statistical power of community-based health intervention studies.
    • Facilitation of more accurate evaluations of disease control strategies globally.