Application of grounded theory to content definition: a case study

Area of Science:

• Health Informatics
• Information Systems
• Qualitative Research

Background:

• Successful clinical information system (CIS) implementation necessitates active clinician engagement in content definition and system development.
• Clinician frustration arises from limited participation in content definition and inadequate patient information access in current systems, especially during downsizing.
• Existing challenges hinder the integration of automated care processes and user acceptance.

Purpose of the Study:

• To explore the application of grounded theory principles for systematic content definition in clinical information systems.
• To facilitate clinician participation in the content definition phase of CIS development.
• To prepare for the implementation of a CIS on medical-surgical units.

Main Methods:

• A qualitative research approach utilizing grounded theory principles.
• A case study methodology to apply grounded theory to CIS content definition.
• Systematic development of content definition for a CIS.

Main Results:

• Grounded theory provides a framework for clinicians to actively participate in defining CIS content.
• Systematic content definition through grounded theory can enhance clinician involvement.
• The study outlines the application of this method in preparation for CIS implementation.

Conclusions:

• Grounded theory is a viable qualitative method to ensure clinician involvement in CIS content definition.
• Enhanced clinician participation can lead to greater acceptance of automated care processes.
• This approach addresses challenges in CIS development and implementation, particularly regarding information access.