Related Experiment Videos
Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered
1Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA. arnett@wam.umd.edu
The American Psychologist
|June 4, 1999
Summary
Adolescent "storm and stress" is not universal but more likely during teenage years. Research supports a modified view, considering individual and cultural differences, with less stress in traditional cultures.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Adolescent Psychology
Background:
- G. S. Hall's (1904) theory posits adolescence as a period of "storm and stress."
- Contemporary research re-examines this view in light of new evidence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reconsider G. S. Hall's "storm and stress" theory.
- To examine evidence regarding parent-adolescent conflict, mood disruptions, and risk behaviors.
- To assess the influence of individual and cultural factors on adolescent stress.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and synthesis of contemporary research findings.
- Analysis of three key aspects: parent-child conflict, mood, and risk-taking.
- Cross-cultural and intra-societal comparisons.
Main Results:
- Evidence supports a modified "storm and stress" view, acknowledging individual and cultural variations.
- Adolescence is a more likely period for storm and stress compared to other life stages.
- Storm and stress appear lower in traditional cultures than in Western societies, potentially increasing with globalization.
Conclusions:
- Adolescent storm and stress is not a universal experience but a more probable phenomenon during adolescence.
- Individual differences and cultural contexts significantly moderate the experience of adolescent storm and stress.
- Both scholars and the public largely support a nuanced, modified "storm and stress" perspective.