Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2026
An “All-laser” Endothelial Transplant
Published on: July 6, 2015
Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty
B Seitz1, A Langenbucher, M M Kus
1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. berthold.seitz@augen.med.uni-erlangen.de
Objective:
To assess the impact of nonmechanical trephination on the outcome after penetrating keratoplasty (PK).
Design:
Prospective, randomized, cross-sectional, clinical, single-center study.
Patients:
A total of 179 eyes of 76 females and 103 males, mean age at the time of surgery 50.6 +/- 18.5 (range, 15-83) years. Inclusion criteria were (1) time interval from October 1992 to December 1997; (2) one surgeon (GOHN); (3) primary central PK; (4) Fuchs dystrophy (diameter, 7.5 mm) or keratoconus (diameter, 8.0 mm); (5) graft oversize, 0.1 mm; (6) no previous intraocular surgery; and (7) 16-bite double-running diagonal suture.
Intervention:
In a randomized fashion, eyes were assigned either to trephination with the 193-nm Meditec excimer laser (manually guided beam in patients, automated rotation device of artificial anterior chamber in donors) along metal masks with eight orientation teeth/notches (EXCIMER: 53 keratoconus, 35 Fuchs dystrophy; mean follow-up, 37 +/- 16 months) or with a hand-held motor trephine (Microkeratron; Geuder) (
Control:
53 keratoconus, 38 Fuchs dystrophy; mean follow-up, 38 +/- 14 months). Subjective refractometry (trial glasses), standard keratometry (Zeiss), and corneal topography analysis (TMS-1; Tomey) were performed before surgery, before removal of the first suture (15.2 +/- 4.2 months), and after removal of the second suture (21.4 +/- 5.6 months).
Main Outcome Measures:
Keratometric and topographic net astigmatism as well as refractive cylinder; keratometric and topographic central power; best-corrected visual acuity (VA); surface regularity index (SRI), surface asymmetry index (SAI), and potential visual acuity (PVA) of the TMS-1.
Results:
Before suture removal, mean refractive/keratometric/topographic astigmatism did not differ significantly between EXCIMER (2.5 +/- 1.8 diopters [D]/3.4 +/- 2.8 D/4.7 +/- 3.1 D) and CONTROL groups (3.0 +/- 1.8 D/3.7 +/- 2.4 D/4.3 +/- 2.1 D). After suture removal, respective values were significantly lower in the EXCIMER group (2.8 +/- 2.0 D/3.0 +/- 2.1 D/3.8 +/- 2.6 D) than in the CONTROL group (4.2 +/- 2.4 D/6.1 +/- 2.7 D/6.7 +/- 3.1 D) (P < 0.0009). In the EXCIMER versus CONTROL group, mean VA increased from 20/100 versus 20/111 (P > 0.05) before surgery, to 20/31 versus 20/38 before (P = 0.001) and to 20/28 versus 20/39 (P < 0.00001) after suture removal. Mean spherical equivalent was significantly less myopic in the EXCIMER group before (-0.9 +/- 3.6 D vs. -2.6 +/- 3.4 D) (P = 0.01) and after suture removal (-1.4 +/- 3.1 D vs. -2.4 +/- 3.5 D) (P = 0.02). Mean SRI (P = 0.04) and PVA (P = 0.007) were significantly more favorable in the EXCIMER versus CONTROL group after suture removal (0.91 +/- 0.45 and 0.82 +/- 0.15 vs. 1.05 +/- 0.46 and 0.73 +/- 0.18).
Conclusions:
Postkeratoplasty results seem to be superior using nonmechanical excimer laser trephination. Thus, this methodology is recommended as the procedure of first choice in avascular corneal pathologies requiring PK.
