Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reply to the Commentaries on the Math-Fact Retrieval Hypothesis.

Royer1, Tronsky, Marchant

  • 1University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Contemporary Educational Psychology
|June 22, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What determines the outcome after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma-15 years experience of a specialist surgical unit.

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2013
Same author

Medical treatment of shock and surgical intervention in war wounded.

Memoires. Academie de chirurgie (France)·2010
Same author

Control of edema in kidney disease.

Case reports. Children's Memorial Hospital (Chicago, Ill.)·2010
Same author

The movement and its cerebellar component.

Journal belge de neurologie et de psychiatrie·2010
Same author

Antithrombotic therapy is associated with better survival in patients with severe heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (EPICAL study).

European journal of heart failure·2002
Same author

Drugs for Alzheimer's disease

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2000
Same journal

Should I stay or should I go? Children's motivation in response to feedback and its association with math anxiety and math self-concept.

Contemporary educational psychology·2025
Same journal

The Joint Operations of Teacher-Student and Peer Relationships on Classroom Engagement among Low-Achieving Elementary Students: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study.

Contemporary educational psychology·2024
Same journal

Feelings on feedback: Children's emotional responses during mathematics problem solving.

Contemporary educational psychology·2023
Same journal

Parent-child conflict during homeschooling in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: A key role for mothers' self-efficacy in teaching.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
Same journal

The 'Fauci Effect': Reducing COVID-19 misconceptions and vaccine hesitancy using an authentic multimodal intervention.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
Same journal

The Role of Stereotype Threat in Ethnically Minoritized Students' Science Motivation: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study of Achievement and Persistence in STEM.

Contemporary educational psychology·2022
See all related articles

This study examines gender differences in math performance, acknowledging limitations in the math-fact retrieval hypothesis. It proposes alternative explanations and calls for intervention research to understand these complex disparities.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Educational Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • The math-fact retrieval hypothesis suggests a link between retrieving math facts and gender differences in math performance.
  • Existing correlational evidence is suggestive but not compelling.
  • Several limitations of this hypothesis are acknowledged.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the math-fact retrieval hypothesis.
  • To explore alternative hypotheses, including spatial cognition and affective/motivational factors.
  • To address gender differences in both math test and grade performance.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critique of existing literature on gender differences in math performance.
  • Analysis of correlational evidence linking math-fact retrieval to performance disparities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of theoretical frameworks and their explanatory power.

    • Main Results:

    • Agreement with limitations of the math-fact retrieval hypothesis.
    • Disagreement with spatial cognition and affective/motivational hypotheses regarding test and grade performance.
    • Identification of areas needing further investigation and intervention research.

    Conclusions:

    • Math-fact retrieval is likely not the sole explanation for gender differences in math performance.
    • Spatial cognition and affective/motivational factors may not fully account for observed differences.
    • Further research, particularly intervention studies, is crucial to resolve these complex issues.