Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How many subjects constitute a study?

K J Friston1, A P Holmes, K J Worsley

  • 1The Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.

Neuroimage
|July 1, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Topographic Variation in Human Neurotransmitter Receptor Densities Explains Differences in Intracranial EEG Spectra.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

Canalization and plasticity in psychopathology.

Neuropharmacology·2022
Same author

Familial atrial fibrillation mutation M1875T-SCN5A increases early sodium current and dampens the effect of flecainide.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2022
Same author

REBUS and the Anarchic Brain: Toward a Unified Model of the Brain Action of Psychedelics.

Pharmacological reviews·2019
Same author

A validation of dynamic causal modelling for 7T fMRI.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2018
Same author

Neurophysiologically-informed markers of individual variability and pharmacological manipulation of human cortical gamma.

NeuroImage·2017
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Functional neuroimaging in medicine (fMRI) offers two inference types: typical characteristics in healthy subjects and average differences in clinical populations. Understanding these distinctions guides appropriate statistical analysis for robust findings.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • fMRI research involves two primary inference classes: characterizing typical features in healthy populations and assessing average differences in clinical studies.
  • Distinguishing between these inference types is crucial for selecting appropriate analytical methods in neuroimaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the two main classes of inference in fMRI studies.
  • To guide the selection of statistical models based on the research question and population.

Main Methods:

  • The study categorizes fMRI inferences into those describing typical (qualitative) and average (quantitative) characteristics.
  • It links typical inference to conjunction analyses and fixed-effects models suitable for smaller cohorts of healthy subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It associates average inference with random-effects analyses required for larger cohorts in clinical neuroscience.

    • Main Results:

    • Inferences about typical characteristics in healthy individuals are adequately addressed by conjunction analyses and fixed-effects models with small sample sizes.
    • Inferences about average quantitative differences in clinical populations necessitate random-effects analyses and larger study cohorts.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of statistical approach in fMRI, specifically fixed-effects versus random-effects models, depends critically on the nature of the inference (typical vs. average) and the study population.
    • Appropriate statistical methods ensure valid conclusions in both basic neuroscience and clinical applications of fMRI.