Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Manipulation with no or partial vision.

K A Purdy1, S J Lederman, R L Klatzky

  • 1Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. kpurdy@gw.uscs.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|July 1, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Figure/Ground Segmentation via a Haptic Glance: Attributing Initial Finger Contacts to Objects or Their Supporting Surfaces.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Tactile and Haptic Illusions.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Please Touch: Object Properties that Invite Touch.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Using visual codes for comparisons of pictures.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Labeling effects on memory for nonsense pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Haptic Classification of Facial Identity in 2D Displays: Configural versus Feature-Based Processing.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2010
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Vision significantly impacts manipulation tasks, enhancing speed in most stages except reaching. Optimal performance in peg-in-hole tasks occurs when vision is limited to early stages, suggesting distinct roles for visual feedback during movement.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Human Factors
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding the role of vision in motor control is crucial for explaining human performance in daily tasks.
  • Closed-loop (error-correcting) and open-loop (pre-programmed) processing models offer frameworks for analyzing movement control.
  • Manipulation tasks involve complex sequences of movements where visual feedback is often integral.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how vision influences different stages of closed- and open-loop manipulation.
  • To determine the effect of practice on visual dependency across distinct manipulation phases.
  • To identify optimal visual conditions for learning and performing manipulative tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed accuracy and speed of common manipulation tasks performed without vision.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Examined practice effects on a peg-in-hole task across four functional stages, comparing performance with and without vision.
  • Experiment 3: Investigated the impact of partial visual feedback during different stages of learning the peg-in-hole task after initial full vision training.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants achieved high accuracy in rapid manipulation tasks without vision (Experiment 1).
    • Vision improved performance in prereach, grasp, and transport+insert stages but slowed the reach stage during practice (Experiment 2).
    • Learning and performance were fastest when vision was restricted to the prereach and reach stages (Experiment 3).

    Conclusions:

    • Vision plays a differential role across manipulation stages, facilitating some while potentially hindering others.
    • Extensive practice can alter visual dependency, with optimal visual input varying by task phase.
    • Limiting visual feedback to early movement stages may enhance overall manipulation efficiency.