Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Using visual codes for comparisons of pictures.

R L Klatzky1, A M Stoy

  • 1University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, California.

Memory & Cognition
|November 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Visual System01:26

Visual System

2.3K
Light enters the eye through the cornea, a transparent, dome-shaped surface covering the surface of the eyeball that helps to direct and focus incoming light. This light is then channeled toward the pupil, an adjustable opening whose size is controlled by the iris. The iris, a pigmented muscle, regulates the amount of light entering the eye by contracting or dilating the pupil, thereby ensuring optimal light levels for clear vision.
Once through the pupil, the light passes through the lens, a...
2.3K
Bar Graph01:07

Bar Graph

17.3K
A bar graph is also called a bar chart and consists of bars that are separated from each other. It either uses horizontal or vertical bars to show comparisons among categories. The bars can be rectangles, or they can be rectangular boxes (used in three-dimensional plots). One axis of the graph represents the specific categories being compared, and the other axis shows a discrete value. In this graph, the length of the bar for each category is proportional to the number or percent of individuals...
17.3K
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting01:26

Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting

1.8K
Focus Charting, also known as the focus charting system or "focus documentation," is a systematic documentation approach used in healthcare to organize patient information in medical records.
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
1.8K
Graphical Representation of Inequalities01:28

Graphical Representation of Inequalities

455
The graph of the equation where y equals x squared forms a curve known as a parabola. This curve acts as a boundary in the coordinate plane, dividing it into distinct regions based on the relative position of points.When the equality sign in the equation is replaced with an inequality—such as greater than, less than, greater than or equal to, or less than or equal to—the graphical representation changes from a single curve into a broader shaded area that signifies the set of all...
455
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.5K
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

2.0K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Please Touch: Object Properties that Invite Touch.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2016
Same author

Labeling effects on memory for nonsense pictures.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Haptic Classification of Facial Identity in 2D Displays: Configural versus Feature-Based Processing.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2010
Same author

Haptic perception: a tutorial.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2009
Same author

Haptic Processing of Facial Expressions of Emotion in 2D Raised-Line Drawings.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2008
Same author

Haptic recognition of static and dynamic expressions of emotion in the live face.

Psychological science·2007
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study investigated how people compare object names and images. Results suggest visual codes are used for matching, and these codes adapt based on task demands and context.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Understanding visual object recognition and name retrieval is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Investigating the influence of physical similarity and task context on visual matching processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the role of visual codes in comparing nonidentical pictures based on their names.
  • To determine how interstimulus intervals (ISIs) and session types (pure vs. mixed) affect reaction times (RTs) in object matching tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted using visual matching tasks with varying interstimulus intervals (ISIs).
  • Participants responded whether two object pictures shared the same name (positive trial) or not (negative trial).
  • Stimuli included identity matches, mirror matches, and name matches, presented in sets with varying physical similarity.

More Related Videos

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

8.6K
Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

22.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K
Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

8.6K
Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
10:11

Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking IPL: Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism

Published on: December 14, 2012

22.1K

Main Results:

  • Identity and mirror matches were faster than name matches, with this advantage diminishing as ISI increased.
  • Physical similarity between name-match pairs facilitated performance, particularly in identity matches.
  • Mixed sessions revealed differences in RTs between stimulus sets for both name and identity matches, unlike pure sessions.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide evidence for the utilization of dynamic visual codes in comparing nonidentical pictures.
  • These visual codes appear to be flexible, adapting to experimental context and task demands.
  • This research contributes to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying visual object recognition and comparison.