Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Open versus arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a comparative study.

T S O'Brien1, T S Hart, M J Shereff

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

Foot & Ankle International
|July 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human EBV-transformed lymphocytes of patients with Schistosoma japonicum infection secrete idiotypically related immunoregulatory antibodies.

Clinical immunology and immunopathology·1992
Same author

Is perception of exertion a unique characteristic?

Perceptual and motor skills·1992
Same author

Studies support safety of fiberglass.

Occupational health & safety (Waco, Tex.)·1992
Same author

Effects of laboratory-induced controllable and uncontrollable stress on Rorschach variables m and Y.

Journal of personality assessment·1992
Same author

A simple fluorescent technique for screening cervical cells prior to nuclear analysis.

Anticancer research·1992
Same author

A nasal trumpet orthosis to maintain nares openings and respiratory function for patients with facial burns: a case report.

The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation·1992
Same journal

Defining Radiographic Threshold Values for the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity Classification System: A Large-Cohort Diagnostic Study.

Foot & ankle international·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Limited Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Foot & ankle international·2026
Same journal

The Amount of Peroneus Longus Insertion Resection With Modified Lapidus Procedure for Severe Hallux Valgus: Comparative Radiographic Study of 2 Different Osteotomy Methods.

Foot & ankle international·2026
Same journal

Two-Stage vs Single-Stage Ilizarov Application in High-Risk Patients: Impact on Early Complications and Resource Utilization.

Foot & ankle international·2026
Same journal

Staging Strategies for the Infected, Deformed Foot.

Foot & ankle international·2026
Same journal

Distal Oblique Osteotomy vs Arthrodesis for Advanced Hallux Rigidus: A Matched Cohort Study.

Foot & ankle international·2026
See all related articles

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis offers comparable fusion rates to open surgery but with significantly reduced complications, shorter procedures, and quicker recovery. This minimally invasive approach is a viable alternative for select patients with ankle arthritis.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Ankle arthritis significantly impacts patient mobility and quality of life.
  • Ankle arthrodesis is a common surgical treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis.
  • Traditional open arthrodesis can involve substantial morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis versus open ankle arthrodesis.
  • To evaluate perioperative parameters and fusion rates between the two surgical techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 36 patients (19 arthroscopic, 17 open).
  • Inclusion criteria for arthroscopic group defined by limited angular deformities.
  • Open group criteria based on maximum deformities from the arthroscopic group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of perioperative parameters including fusion rates, morbidity, operative time, tourniquet time, blood loss, and hospital stay.

    • Main Results:

    • Comparable fusion rates were achieved in both arthroscopic and open ankle arthrodesis groups.
    • Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis demonstrated significantly less morbidity.
    • Shorter operative times, tourniquet times, reduced blood loss, and shorter hospital stays were observed in the arthroscopic group.

    Conclusions:

    • Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is a safe and effective alternative to open arthrodesis for selected patients.
    • The minimally invasive approach offers significant advantages in terms of patient recovery and reduced complications.
    • This technique is suitable for patients with ankle arthritis and limited angular deformities.