Related Experiment Videos
Psychotechnology and insanity at the wheel
1Sea Education Association.
Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences
|July 9, 1999
Summary
Psychological testing of over 15,000 drivers from 1936-1965 revealed that clinicians reinforced ethnic, racial, and gender stereotypes. Unfit drivers faced sanctions like license revocation or commitment.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Criminology
- Traffic Safety
Background:
- The Psychopathic Clinic of the Detroit Recorder's Court Traffic Court conducted psychological evaluations of automobile drivers between 1936 and 1965.
- Over 15,000 drivers were assessed, including those with traffic code violations or collision involvement.
Observation:
- A statistical analysis was performed on the collected data from these driver evaluations.
- The study examined the methodologies and outcomes of psychological assessments in the context of traffic law enforcement.
Findings:
- Psychologists and psychiatrists at the clinic perpetuated existing ethnic, racial, and gender stereotypes.
- These biases were evident in the assessments conducted under the guise of traffic safety.
Implications:
- The findings highlight the historical influence of societal biases on psychological evaluations within the legal system.
- Recommendations for sanctions, such as license revocation or commitment, were influenced by these reinforced stereotypes.
- This historical analysis provides critical insights into the evolution of forensic psychology and its intersection with social justice.