Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
[Standards for expert assessment of credibility]
1Institut und Poliklinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Klinikum Innenstadt.
Expert judgment on child abuse credibility is crucial. A systematic, criteria-based analysis ensures quality, avoiding suggestive techniques in psychological and psychiatric evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Child Psychiatry
Background:
- Expert judgment on children's statements is vital in abuse cases.
- Specialists in psychology and child/adolescent psychiatry provide this expertise.
- Mandatory psychiatric consultation is required if child psychopathology is present.
Observation:
- Assessment and judgment require adherence to quality standards.
- Systematic procedures are essential for reliable evaluations.
- Criteria-based analysis of statements is a key innovation.
Findings:
- The study emphasizes systematic procedures in evaluating children's statements.
- Avoidance of suggestive interviewing techniques is critical.
- Criteria-based analysis enhances the credibility assessment process.
Implications:
- Implementing standardized methods improves the accuracy of expert judgments.
- This approach supports child protection in legal and clinical settings.
- Ensuring quality in expert testimony is paramount for justice.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

