Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On achieving strong inference in prehension research.

R G Marteniuk1, C P Bertram

  • 1Human Motor Systems Laboratory, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6.

Motor Control
|July 20, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Researchers question a new mathematical model for human prehension, arguing it is insufficient for advancing motor control science. The classical approach remains a vital area of study.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retention characteristics of motor short-term memory cues.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Psychophysics of kinesthesis.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Further considerations of "retention characteristics of motor short-term memory cues".

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Motor short-term memory measures as a function of methodology.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Individual differences in intra-individual variability.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Efficiency of learning as a function of practice schedule and initial ability.

Journal of motor behavior·2013

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control
  • Neuroscience
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • The classical approach to human prehension, pioneered by Jeanneret, has been foundational in motor control research.
  • Smeets and Brenner proposed a mathematical model as an alternative to the classical approach.

Discussion:

  • This critique evaluates the mathematical model proposed by Smeets and Brenner.
  • The paper argues that the proposed model lacks sufficient evidence for broad acceptance within the scientific community.

Key Insights:

  • The mathematical model presented by Smeets and Brenner is deemed inadequate for advancing the science of motor control.
  • The study emphasizes the continued relevance and necessity of Jeanneret's classical approach.

Outlook:

  • Further research is needed to develop robust models that can genuinely advance motor control science.
  • Re-evaluation of existing frameworks, like the classical approach, is crucial for scientific progress.

Related Experiment Videos