[The maxilla--a poor implant site?]

In the maxilla, it is sometimes necessary to use implants to achieve a good prosthetic result. However, an increased failure rate of maxillary implants seems to be a common clinical experience. This experience was investigated in a retrospective statistical analysis. In a retrospective study of 665 patients between 1987 and 1997, 2484 implants were examined. The implants in the upper jaw were compared to those in the lower jaw. Implants with and without autogenous bone grafts and fixtures in patients with alveolar ridge atrophy, tumor, or trauma were explored. In particular, the data obtained from the orthopantomograms after completion of the prosthetic superstructures were controlled for peri-implantary bone loss evaluation. A total of 40% of the fixtures were placed in the maxilla, and 30% of these implants were combined with a local or an iliac bone graft. Out of 2484 implants, 207 were lost, largely during the healing period. The failure rates in the groups of patients with alveolar ridge atrophy, tumor, and trauma were between 6 and 27.5%, and the differences between these groups were higher than the difference between the upper and the lower jaw. Especially in the maxilla and after osteoplasty, horizontal peri-implantary bone loss was increased, with some cases of dramatic bone loss and decrease of the osseous integration of the fixtures. There was no statistic evidence of a significantly higher failure rate in the upper jaw than in the lower jaw. However, besides the rate of implant loss, additional markers should also be considered for adequate evaluation of implant prognosis in the maxilla.