Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rigid videosigmoidoscopy vs conventional sigmoidoscopy. A randomized controlled study.

N J Taffinder1, S W Gould, A C Wan

  • 1Academic Surgical Unit, 10th Floor, QEQM Wing, Saint Mary's Hospital, South Wharf Road, London W2 1NY, UK.

Surgical Endoscopy
|August 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2022
Same author

Trends and associated factors for Covid-19 hospitalisation and fatality risk in 2.3 million adults in England.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

'Dear Doctor': a randomised controlled trial of a text message intervention to reduce burnout in trainee anaesthetists.

Anaesthesia·2022
Same author

Assessment of the introduction of semi-digital consent into surgical practice.

The British journal of surgery·2021
Same author

Investigating the Role of Diet and Exercise in Gut Microbe-Host Cometabolism.

mSystems·2020
Same author

Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BJS open·2020
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Conversion of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty to bariatric surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

A new fine-bore rigid videosigmoidoscope offers improved visualization of the sigmoid colon. This advanced videosigmoidoscope provides greater insertion depth and less patient discomfort compared to conventional sigmoidoscopy.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Devices
  • Endoscopy

Background:

  • Conventional rigid sigmoidoscopy has limitations in patient comfort and visualization success rates (40-70%).
  • A novel fine-bore rigid videosigmoidoscope was developed to address these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a new fine-bore rigid videosigmoidoscope with a conventional rigid sigmoidoscope.
  • To evaluate patient discomfort and the length of insertion achieved with each device.

Main Methods:

  • 58 patients underwent examination with both sigmoidoscopes in a randomized order.
  • Discomfort was measured using a visual analogue scale, and insertion length was recorded by the surgeon.
  • Patients were blinded to the device used, and video images were transmitted for real-time consultation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The videosigmoidoscope achieved a significantly greater mean insertion distance (23.2 cm) compared to the conventional sigmoidoscope (16.5 cm) (p < 0.01).
  • Patient-reported discomfort was significantly lower with the videosigmoidoscope (3.0) than the conventional sigmoidoscope (5.5) (p < 0.01).
  • Users preferred the videosigmoidoscope for image quality and ease of use.

Conclusions:

  • The thinner, longer rigid videosigmoidoscope is more effective for examining the proximal sigmoid colon.
  • It allows for deeper insertion with reduced patient discomfort.
  • High-quality video imaging facilitates recording and real-time teleconsultation.