Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Coralline bone graft substitutes.

E C Shors1

  • 1Research and New Technology, Interpore Cross International, Irvine, California, USA. eshors@interpore.com

The Orthopedic Clinics of North America
|September 3, 1999
PubMed
Summary

This study explores the use of coralline porous ceramics as bone graft substitutes. These implants are biocompatible and allow bone and soft tissue to grow into their structure when placed correctly. The research shows that the rate of implant resorption depends on both material properties and biological factors. Composite technology with resorbable polymers can enhance mechanical properties. The findings suggest that these implants support bone remodeling according to Wolff's law. The study highlights the potential of these materials as effective alternatives to traditional bone grafts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes. Evaluation of bone density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Investigative radiology·1996
Same author

Bone formation and implant degradation of coralline porous ceramics placed in bone and ectopic sites.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1995
Same author

Effect of demineralized bone matrix on bone growth within a porous HA material: a histologic and histometric study.

Journal of biomaterials applications·1995
Same author

An in-vitro evaluation of coralline porous hydroxyapatite as a scaffold for osteoblast growth.

Clinical materials·1993
Same author

Bone ingrowth and mechanical properties of coralline hydroxyapatite 1 yr after implantation.

Biomaterials·1993
Same author

Bone formation process in porous calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite.

Journal of biomedical materials research·1992

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic biomaterials research
  • Tissue engineering in regenerative medicine
  • Bioceramics in clinical applications

Background:

Current clinical practices require effective bone graft substitutes that support tissue regeneration. Prior research has shown that coralline porous ceramics offer biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. However, the long-term behavior of these implants remains unclear. This gap motivated investigations into how implant properties and biological factors influence resorption rates. No prior work had resolved the interplay between porosity and bone remodeling dynamics. Established knowledge includes the role of porosity in cell infiltration and vascularization. Yet, the impact of composite technologies on mechanical performance is less understood. This paper's contribution lies in clarifying how these implants adapt to physiological conditions.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of coralline porous ceramics as bone graft substitutes. A specific problem is understanding how implant properties and biological factors influence resorption. The motivation stems from the need for durable and biocompatible grafts. Researchers focused on the role of porosity and chemical composition in tissue integration. They also examined the effects of composite technology on mechanical properties. The study sought to determine if these implants can support bone remodeling. The goal was to assess the interplay between implant design and biological response. This work addresses the need for improved graft materials in orthopedic applications.

Keywords:
biocompatible implantstissue engineeringbone graft materialsregenerative medicine

Frequently Asked Questions

The implants' porosity allows bone and soft tissue to grow into and throughout the material when placed in direct apposition to viable bone.

It enhances the mechanical properties of coralline porous ceramics, making them more suitable for clinical applications.

Direct apposition ensures that bone and soft tissue can infiltrate the implant's porosity, promoting tissue integration and remodeling.

Porosity influences the rate of tissue infiltration and vascularization, which are essential for successful implant integration.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The study used large animal models and human clinical data to evaluate implant performance. Researchers analyzed how bone and soft tissue integrate with coralline ceramics. They assessed the role of direct apposition and interface stabilization in tissue growth. The team examined the effects of implant porosity on cell infiltration and vascularization. They also studied the influence of chemical composition on resorption rates. Composite technology with resorbable polymers was tested for mechanical improvements. The approach combined in vivo observations with material property analysis. The study focused on how these factors modulate bone remodeling dynamics.

Main Results:

The strongest finding is that coralline porous ceramics support bone and soft tissue growth into their porosity. When placed in direct apposition to viable bone, tissue integration occurs effectively. The study found that implant resorption is modulated by both chemical composition and biological factors. Bone remodeling within the implant follows Wolff's law in response to mechanical stimuli. Researchers observed that porosity influences the rate of tissue infiltration and vascularization. Composite technology with resorbable polymers improved mechanical properties. The results suggest that implant properties and biological environment interact to determine resorption rates. These findings highlight the potential of coralline ceramics as effective bone graft substitutes.

Conclusions:

The authors state that coralline porous ceramics can serve as effective bone graft substitutes. They propose that tissue integration depends on direct apposition and interface stabilization. The study suggests that both implant properties and biological factors modulate resorption rates. Researchers conclude that composite technology improves mechanical performance. They propose that these implants support bone remodeling according to Wolff's law. The findings indicate that porosity and chemical composition influence tissue growth dynamics. The authors suggest that these materials may offer advantages over traditional graft options. They propose that further research is needed to optimize implant properties for clinical use.

Bone within the implant remodels in response to mechanical stimuli, following Wolff's law as observed in the study.

The authors suggest that further research is needed to optimize implant properties for clinical use and improve mechanical performance.