Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fetal position and size data for dose estimation.

E K Osei1, K Faulkner

  • 1Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

The British Journal of Radiology
|September 4, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sci-Thur AM: Planning - 12: Comparative study of SBRT lung dose calculation using Eclipse and Monte Carlo.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Poster - Thur Eve - 77: Coordinate transformation from DICOM to DOSXYZnrc.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Poster - Thurs Eve-27: Method of estimating imaging dose to patients from on-line cone-beam computed tomography using patient size data.

Medical physics·2017
Same author

Public health promotion: the role of the dermatologist.

The British journal of dermatology·2015
Same author

Criteria and suspension levels in diagnostic radiology.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same author

The revision of RP 91 on criteria for acceptability of radiological (including radiotherapy) and nuclear medicine installations.

Radiation protection dosimetry·2012
Same journal

Machine learning models using 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for RAS mutation prediction and prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Predictors of Relapse in Oligometastatic Prostate Patients Receiving Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of Radiotherapy and Response in the Management of Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Ensuring radiology reporting quality across a national lung cancer screening programme.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Utility of High-Resolution Semiconductor Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Breast Cancer Extent: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The British journal of radiology·2026
Same journal

Airway Imaging Practices in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Global Survey to Guide Standardized Guidelines.

The British journal of radiology·2026
See all related articles

Accurate fetal absorbed dose estimation requires precise fetal depth measurements. Using average depths can lead to significant over or underestimation in radiological assessments, impacting patient safety.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiological Sciences
  • Obstetrics

Background:

  • Accurate estimation of fetal absorbed dose is crucial for radiological examinations during pregnancy.
  • Variability in fetal position and maternal anatomy can affect dose calculations.
  • Previous studies may have relied on generalized fetal depth data, potentially leading to inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish positional and size data for fetal absorbed dose estimation.
  • To analyze the influence of various factors on fetal depth and size.
  • To quantify the potential errors in fetal absorbed dose calculations using average versus individual fetal depth measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Ultrasound scans were performed on 215 pregnant women to measure fetal depth and size parameters.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measurements included depth from the maternal anterior surface to the fetal head and abdomen midline.
  • Fetal size was assessed using abdominal and head circumference, femur length, and biparietal diameter.

    • Main Results:

    • Fetal depth increased with gestational age, ranging from 6.5 cm to 10.2 cm for mean fetal depth (MFD).
    • Fetal presentation, maternal bladder volume, and placenta location significantly influenced fetal depth.
    • Using average MFD (8.1 cm) instead of individual measurements led to dose overestimations up to 66% or underestimations up to 77%.

    Conclusions:

    • Individualized fetal depth measurements are essential for accurate absorbed dose calculations.
    • Failure to account for individual variations can result in substantial errors in fetal dose estimation.
    • These findings highlight the need for patient-specific data in radiation protection during pregnancy.