Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Comparison of imipenem and ceftazidime as therapy for severe melioidosis
A J Simpson1, Y Suputtamongkol, M D Smith
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. fnajs@diamond.mahidol.ac.th
Abstract:
An open, prospective, randomized, comparative treatment trial was conducted to compare the therapeutic efficacy of high-dose intravenous imipenem and ceftazidime for acute severe melioidosis. Adult Thai patients with suspected acute, severe melioidosis were randomized to receive either imipenem, at a dosage of 50 mg/(kg x d), or ceftazidime, at a dosage of 120 mg/(kg x d), for a minimum of 10 days. The main outcome measures were death or treatment failure. Of the 296 patients enrolled, 214 had culture-confirmed melioidosis, and 132 (61.7%) of them had positive blood cultures. Mortality among patients with melioidosis was 36.9% overall. There were no differences in survival overall (P = .96) or after 48 hours (P = .3). Treatment failure after 48 hours was more common among patients treated with ceftazidime (P = .011). Both treatments were well tolerated. Imipenem is a safe and effective treatment for acute severe melioidosis and may be considered an alternative to ceftazidime.
Insights
High-dose imipenem and ceftazidime showed similar survival rates for severe melioidosis. However, imipenem resulted in less treatment failure, suggesting it as a viable alternative therapy.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Melioidosis, a severe bacterial infection, requires effective antibiotic treatment.
- High-dose intravenous antibiotics are crucial for managing acute, severe cases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of high-dose intravenous imipenem versus ceftazidime in treating acute severe melioidosis.
- To evaluate mortality and treatment failure rates between the two antibiotic regimens.
Main Methods:
- An open, prospective, randomized comparative trial.
- Adult Thai patients with suspected acute severe melioidosis received either imipenem (50 mg/kg/day) or ceftazidime (120 mg/kg/day) for at least 10 days.
- Outcomes assessed included death and treatment failure.
Main Results:
- Of 296 enrolled patients, 214 had culture-confirmed melioidosis.
- Overall mortality was 36.9%; no significant difference in survival was observed between imipenem and ceftazidime groups.
- Treatment failure after 48 hours was significantly more common in the ceftazidime group (P = .011).
Conclusions:
- High-dose imipenem is a safe and effective treatment for acute severe melioidosis.
- Imipenem demonstrates a potential advantage over ceftazidime due to lower treatment failure rates.
- Imipenem can be considered an alternative therapeutic option for severe melioidosis.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Anthelminthic Agents

