Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Educational programs in US medical schools, 1998-1999.

B Barzansky1, H S Jonas, S I Etzel

  • 1Division of Undergraduate Medical Education, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL 60610, USA. Barbara_Barzansky@ama-assn.org

JAMA
|September 9, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparisons among three types of generalist physicians: Personal characteristics, medical school experiences, financial aid, and other factors influencing career choice.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2013
Same author

Commentary: Research on specialty choice: the challenge is in the details.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2004
Same author

The fourth-year medical curriculum: has anything changed in 20 years?

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

Educational programs in US medical schools, 2000-2001.

JAMA·2001
Same author

US graduate medical education, 2000-2001.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Educational programs in US medical schools, 1999-2000.

JAMA·2000
Same journal

Deescalation, Discontinuation, and Deimplementation Trials: Evaluating Whether and How to Do Less.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for GERD.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

The Psychedelic Therapies Executive Order: On Approval and Clinical Readiness.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

"Suturing": Love, Death, and Perfection's Limits.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

What Is Low Back Pain?

JAMA·2026
Same journal

From Silicon Valley to the Vatican-The Expanding Debate on AI Ethics.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Medical school applicant numbers declined, but academic standards held steady. Curriculum hours decreased, while more schools required passing United States Medical Licensing Examination Steps 1 and 2.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Health Workforce Trends

Background:

  • The landscape of medical education in the United States is continually evolving.
  • Understanding current trends is crucial for future physician training and healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive overview of the status of medical education programs in the U.S.
  • To analyze key trends in medical education throughout the late 20th century.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the 1998-1999 Liaison Committee on Medical Education Annual Medical School Questionnaire (100% response rate).
  • Incorporated supplementary data from various other sources to provide a broader context.

Main Results:

  • Total full-time faculty increased by 1.5% in 1998-1999.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Medical school applicant numbers decreased for the second year, though academic qualifications of matriculants remained stable.
  • While applicants from underrepresented minority groups saw a smaller decrease, the proportion of women applicants slightly increased.
  • Curricular hours in early years declined, but clinical clerkship lengths were consistent.
  • The percentage of schools requiring passing both Steps 1 and 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) rose to 50%.
  • Conclusions:

    • Medical education in the U.S. is adapting, with shifts in applicant demographics and curriculum structure.
    • Increasing emphasis on standardized national examinations like the USMLE is evident.
    • Sustained faculty numbers and stable academic qualifications suggest resilience in medical training despite declining applicant pools.