Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Educational programs in US medical schools, 2000-2001.

B Barzansky1, S I Etzel

  • 1Division of Undergraduate and Graduate Medical Education Policy and Standards, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610, USA. Barbara_Barzansky@ama-assn.org

JAMA
|September 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparisons among three types of generalist physicians: Personal characteristics, medical school experiences, financial aid, and other factors influencing career choice.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2013
Same author

Commentary: Research on specialty choice: the challenge is in the details.

Education for health (Abingdon, England)·2004
Same author

The fourth-year medical curriculum: has anything changed in 20 years?

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2001
Same author

US graduate medical education, 2000-2001.

JAMA·2001
Same author

Educational programs in US medical schools, 1999-2000.

JAMA·2000
Same author

Education in end-of-life care during medical school and residency training.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·1999
Same journal

Deescalation, Discontinuation, and Deimplementation Trials: Evaluating Whether and How to Do Less.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for GERD.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

The Psychedelic Therapies Executive Order: On Approval and Clinical Readiness.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

"Suturing": Love, Death, and Perfection's Limits.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

What Is Low Back Pain?

JAMA·2026
Same journal

From Silicon Valley to the Vatican-The Expanding Debate on AI Ethics.

JAMA·2026
See all related articles

Medical school faculty increased slightly, but applicant numbers decreased. Many institutions underwent curriculum changes and faced challenges with clinical teaching patient availability and volunteer faculty recruitment.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Health Workforce Analysis

Background:

  • The Liaison Committee on Medical Education Annual Medical School Questionnaire provides critical data on medical education in the U.S.
  • Understanding trends in faculty, applicants, curriculum, and clinical training is vital for the future of healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe the status of medical education programs in the United States for the 2000-2001 academic year.
  • To identify key changes and challenges in medical school operations and student progression.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the 2000-2001 Liaison Committee on Medical Education Annual Medical School Questionnaire with a 100% response rate.
  • Incorporated additional data sources to provide a comprehensive overview of medical education.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Full-time medical school faculty increased by 1.1% to 103,553.
  • Applicant numbers decreased by 3.7% to 37,092 for the class entering in 2000.
  • 58% of schools were engaged in major curriculum review; 58% required passing USMLE Steps 1 and 2 for advancement.
  • Patient availability for clinical teaching declined in nearly half of schools.
  • Schools reported difficulties in recruiting/retaining volunteer faculty, with 40 schools offering payment.

Conclusions:

  • Medical education in the U.S. experienced a slight faculty increase but a decrease in applicants during 2000-2001.
  • Significant curriculum reforms and evolving licensing examination requirements were noted.
  • Challenges in clinical teaching resources and volunteer faculty engagement were prevalent, prompting some institutions to offer financial incentives.