Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Published on: February 9, 2011
Pseudo-outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
P T Ender1, S J Durning, W K Woelk
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Wright-Patterson Medical Center, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-5529, USA.
Objective:
To determine whether a high rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at our institution was due to laboratory misclassification and to evaluate the effect of this misclassification.
Material And Methods:
We evaluated all S. aureus isolates identified at our institution during a 60-day period in 1997. Automated susceptibility test results (using the Vitek system) from our clinical microbiology laboratory and an independent laboratory were compared with oxacillin agar screen plate results at both laboratories. Isolates with discordant results for susceptibility to oxacillin were tested by broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations and for the presence of the mecA gene.
Results:
Eighteen (72%) of the 25 organisms (obtained from 17 patients) found to be resistant to oxacillin by the Vitek system at our institution were susceptible by the oxacillin agar screen. Discordant isolates tested by broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations and for the mecA gene were found to be oxacillin susceptible and mecA gene negative. Thus, at our hospital, almost three fourths of the organisms initially identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus by the Vitek system were actually susceptible to oxacillin. This misclassification resulted in needless infection control measures and unnecessary vancomycin use.
Conclusion:
Hospitals that use only automated susceptibility testing for S. aureus should periodically validate their results with additional testing.
Insights
Laboratory misclassification led to a high rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) detection. Most MRSA cases were false positives, causing unnecessary vancomycin use and infection control measures.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- High rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can strain healthcare resources.
- Accurate laboratory identification of MRSA is crucial for effective treatment and infection control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if laboratory misclassification contributed to the observed high rate of MRSA.
- To assess the impact of potential misclassification on patient care and hospital protocols.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of automated Vitek system results with oxacillin agar screen and broth microdilution.
- Testing of discordant isolates for the presence of the mecA gene.
- Evaluation of S. aureus isolates over a 60-day period.
Main Results:
- 72% of isolates initially identified as MRSA by the Vitek system were oxacillin susceptible via agar screening.
- Discordant isolates were confirmed as oxacillin susceptible and mecA gene negative.
- Misclassification led to unnecessary vancomycin use and infection control measures.
Conclusions:
- Automated susceptibility testing for S. aureus requires periodic validation.
- Hospitals should implement confirmatory testing to prevent MRSA misclassification.
- Accurate MRSA identification is vital to avoid resource misallocation.
Related Concept Videos
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Atypical Pneumonia
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

