Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Edta chelation therapy: an ethical problem.

K Christensen1, D Theilade

  • 1Aarhus Medical Test Center, Inc., Aabyhoej, Denmark.

Medical Hypotheses
|September 28, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Alternative slaughter procedures: on-farm slaughter and transport system for broilers.

Poultry science·2023
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Evidence of gene-gene interaction in hidradenitis suppurativa: a nationwide registry study of Danish twins.

The British journal of dermatology·2021
Same author

Impaired fecundity as a marker of health and survival: a Danish twin cohort study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Intrauterine testosterone exposure and depression risk in opposite-sex and same-sex twins, a Danish register study.

Psychological medicine·2021
Same journal

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Induced Central Sensitization: A Hypothesis for Long COVID Symptoms.

Medical hypotheses·2026
Same journal

Subclinical mastitis during lactation: a modifiable risk factor for breast cancer?

Medical hypotheses·2025
Same journal

The Role of Hemispheric Sensory Shifts: Impacts on Stretch Reflex and Motor Plasticity Post-Stroke.

Medical hypotheses·2025
Same journal

Neuron-Targeted Exosome Therapy: A Novel Approach for Treating Cardiogenic Dementia via RyR2 Inhibition.

Medical hypotheses·2025
Same journal

How the Somatosensory System Adapts to the Motor Change in Stroke: A Hemispheric Shift?

Medical hypotheses·2024
Same journal

Unstable Plaque is a Treatable Cause of Cognitive Decline.

Medical hypotheses·2024
See all related articles

Maintaining blinding in clinical trials is crucial. This study demonstrates that sodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Na2edta) infusions cause infusion site burning, making double-blind studies with saline impossible.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • The randomized, double-blind study is the gold standard for clinical drug trials.
  • However, uncritical blinding and insufficient randomization methods can compromise study integrity.
  • Existing guidelines focus on randomization reporting but not all blinding violation methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of maintaining double-blind conditions in a clinical study comparing Na2edta infusion with saline placebo.
  • To assess the potential for blinding violations due to differential adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • A small-scale study involving 10 participants receiving infusions.
  • Comparison of reactions between Na2edta and saline infusions.
  • Statistical analysis of adverse event incidence, specifically burning at the infusion site.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Nine out of ten participants receiving Na2edta experienced burning at the infusion site.
  • This contrasts with a previous multi-center study where only nine incidents occurred in over 1000 Na2edta infusions.
  • The difference in painful reactions between Na2edta and saline groups was statistically significant (P<0.001).

Conclusions:

  • The significant incidence of infusion site burning with Na2edta makes it impossible to maintain blinding when compared to saline placebo.
  • This highlights a specific method of blinding violation not covered by current reporting guidelines.
  • Researchers must carefully consider the potential for differential adverse events when designing double-blind studies.