Related Experiment Videos
Changing trends in program assessment in physical therapy education: perceptions of program directors
1Physical Therapy Department, Southwest Texas State University, San Marcos 78666, USA. BB10@swt.edu
Journal of Allied Health
|October 3, 1999
Summary
Physical therapy programs are shifting assessment focus to activities supporting mission goals. Faculty and chairs heavily participate, while students and staff involvement is lower, despite directors finding new criteria important.
Area of Science:
- Health Professions Education
- Physical Therapy Education
- Program Assessment
Background:
- Educational programs increasingly assess activities aligned with mission and goals, not just student outcomes.
- Accreditation bodies for physical therapy education introduced new assessment criteria with stakeholder participation recommendations.
- These criteria encompass 11 components related to program content, management, and resources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the extent of stakeholder participation in assessing three key program components.
- To understand how program directors perceive the importance of new accreditation criteria.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to program directors of accredited physical therapy programs in the United States.
- Data collection focused on the participation levels of various stakeholders in assessment activities.
- Statistical analysis was used to compare participation rates (p = 0.0000).
Main Results:
- Program chairs and faculty consistently participated (76-100%) in assessment of policies and resources.
- Student, graduate, and support staff participation ranged from 20-57%.
- Approximately 90% of program directors deemed the new criteria important for program effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Significant disparities exist in stakeholder participation in physical therapy program assessment.
- Faculty and chairs are more involved than students, graduates, and support staff.
- Program directors perceive the new accreditation criteria as valuable for enhancing program effectiveness.