Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers.

P Helenius1, R Salmelin, E Service

  • 1Low Temperature Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, PO Box 2200, 02015 HUT, Espoo, FINLAND. paivi@neuro.hut.fi

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|October 8, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children at risk for dyslexia show deficient left-hemispheric memory representations for new spoken word forms.

NeuroImage·2021
Same author

Dynamic Time-Locking Mechanism in the Cortical Representation of Spoken Words.

eNeuro·2020
Same author

The effect of pain on involuntary and voluntary capture of attention.

European journal of pain (London, England)·2014
Same author

Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Optimal spatial filtering for brain oscillatory activity using the Relevance Vector Machine.

Cognitive processing·2013
Same author

Cognitive effects of aromatase inhibitor therapy in peripubertal boys.

European journal of endocrinology·2010
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) revealed that while dyslexic adults engage similar brain areas for reading comprehension, their neural activation is delayed and weaker. Dyslexic readers may rely more on sublexical processing.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Developmental dyslexia is a common reading disorder affecting word recognition and comprehension.
  • Understanding the neural underpinnings of reading comprehension differences in dyslexia is crucial for targeted interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the same brain areas are similarly engaged in reading comprehension in normal and developmentally dyslexic adults using magnetoencephalography (MEG).
  • To identify differences in the timing and strength of neural activation during semantic processing of sentence-ending words between fluent and dyslexic readers.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized magnetoencephalography (MEG) to record brain activity with high temporal and spatial resolution.
  • Presented sentences visually, one word at a time, manipulating the semantic and orthographic appropriateness of the final word.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed cortical responses to expected, semantically appropriate but unexpected, semantically anomalous but orthographically similar, and fully inappropriate sentence endings.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences were found in the spatial distribution of brain areas involved in semantic processing between fluent and dyslexic readers.
    • Activation sensitivity to word meaning began approximately 100 msec later in dyslexic individuals compared to controls.
    • Neural responses were significantly weaker in dyslexic readers, suggesting involvement of a smaller or less-synchronous neural population.
    • Dyslexic readers showed weaker activation to semantically inappropriate words that shared initial letters with expected words, indicating a potential reliance on sublexical processing.

    Conclusions:

    • Fluent and dyslexic readers utilize overlapping brain regions for semantic processing during reading comprehension.
    • Dyslexic readers exhibit delayed and weaker neural responses, likely due to presemantic processing deficits.
    • The word recognition strategy in dyslexia may differ, potentially relying more on sublexical cues than holistic word perception.