Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

In Vitro Scratch Assay to Demonstrate Effects of Arsenic on Skin Cell Migration
Published on: February 23, 2019
Comparative effects of single intraperitoneal or oral doses of sodium arsenate or arsenic trioxide during in utero
D G Stump1, J F Holson, T L Fleeman
1WIL Research Laboratories, Ashland, Ohio 44805, USA.
Abstract:
Numerous studies have suggested that single-day intraperitoneal (IP) injection of inorganic arsenic results in failure of neural tube closure and other malformations in rats, hamsters, and mice. Most of these studies involved treatment of limited numbers of animals with maternally toxic doses of arsenic (generally As(V)), without defining a dose-response relationship. In the present Good Laboratory Practice-compliant study, sodium arsenate (As(V)) was administered IP and arsenic trioxide (As(III)) was administered either IP or orally (by gavage) on gestational day 9 to groups of 25 mated Crl:CD(R)(SD)BR rats. Only at dose levels that caused severe maternal toxicity, including lethality, did IP injection of arsenic trioxide produce neural tube and ocular defects; oral administration of higher doses of arsenic trioxide caused some maternal deaths but no treatment-related fetal malformations. In contrast, IP injection of similar amounts of sodium arsenate (based on the molar amount of arsenic) caused mild maternal toxicity but a large increase in malformations, including neural tube, eye, and jaw defects. In summary, neural tube and craniofacial defects were observed after IP injection of both As(V) and As(III); however, no increase in malformations was seen following oral administration of As(III), even at maternally lethal doses. These results demonstrate that the frequently cited association between prenatal exposure to inorganic arsenic and malformations in laboratory animals is dependent on a route of administration that is not appropriate for human risk assessment.
Insights
Prenatal arsenic exposure via intraperitoneal injection caused birth defects in rats. Oral administration did not, suggesting route of exposure is critical for risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Developmental Biology
- Reproductive Toxicology
Background:
- Previous studies linked inorganic arsenic to birth defects in rodents.
- These studies often used maternally toxic doses and lacked dose-response data.
- The route of arsenic administration in prior research was primarily intraperitoneal injection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the teratogenic effects of inorganic arsenic (As(V) and As(III)) in rats.
- To compare the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) versus oral administration of arsenic.
- To establish dose-response relationships for arsenic-induced developmental toxicity.
Main Methods:
- Good Laboratory Practice-compliant study using Crl:CD(R)(SD)BR rats.
- Gestational day 9 administration of sodium arsenate (As(V)) IP and arsenic trioxide (As(III)) IP or orally.
- Groups of 25 mated rats per treatment arm.
- Evaluation of maternal toxicity and fetal malformations.
Main Results:
- IP arsenic trioxide (As(III)) caused neural tube and ocular defects only at maternally lethal doses.
- Oral arsenic trioxide (As(III)) caused maternal deaths but no fetal malformations.
- IP sodium arsenate (As(V)) caused mild maternal toxicity but significant neural tube, eye, and jaw defects.
Conclusions:
- Both As(V) and As(III) administered IP induced neural tube and craniofacial defects.
- Oral As(III) administration did not increase malformations, even at lethal maternal doses.
- The route of arsenic administration is critical and influences the relevance of animal studies for human risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Teratogenicity
Toxicity Testing in Animals

