Comparative effects of single intraperitoneal or oral doses of sodium arsenate or arsenic trioxide during in utero

D G Stump1, J F Holson, T L Fleeman

  • 1WIL Research Laboratories, Ashland, Ohio 44805, USA.

Teratology
|October 19, 1999
PubMed

Insights

Prenatal arsenic exposure via intraperitoneal injection caused birth defects in rats. Oral administration did not, suggesting route of exposure is critical for risk assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Reproductive Toxicology

Background:

  • Previous studies linked inorganic arsenic to birth defects in rodents.
  • These studies often used maternally toxic doses and lacked dose-response data.
  • The route of arsenic administration in prior research was primarily intraperitoneal injection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the teratogenic effects of inorganic arsenic (As(V) and As(III)) in rats.
  • To compare the effects of intraperitoneal (IP) versus oral administration of arsenic.
  • To establish dose-response relationships for arsenic-induced developmental toxicity.

Main Methods:

  • Good Laboratory Practice-compliant study using Crl:CD(R)(SD)BR rats.
  • Gestational day 9 administration of sodium arsenate (As(V)) IP and arsenic trioxide (As(III)) IP or orally.
  • Groups of 25 mated rats per treatment arm.
  • Evaluation of maternal toxicity and fetal malformations.

Main Results:

  • IP arsenic trioxide (As(III)) caused neural tube and ocular defects only at maternally lethal doses.
  • Oral arsenic trioxide (As(III)) caused maternal deaths but no fetal malformations.
  • IP sodium arsenate (As(V)) caused mild maternal toxicity but significant neural tube, eye, and jaw defects.

Conclusions:

  • Both As(V) and As(III) administered IP induced neural tube and craniofacial defects.
  • Oral As(III) administration did not increase malformations, even at lethal maternal doses.
  • The route of arsenic administration is critical and influences the relevance of animal studies for human risk assessment.