Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions.

¹Sanger Centre, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. th@sanger.ac.uk

|October 20, 1999

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effect of strength and proprioception training on eversion to inversion strength ratios in subjects with unilateral functional ankle instability.

British journal of sports medicine·2003

Same author

Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and interresidue contacts.

Proteins·2002

Same author

Mining the draft human genome.

Nature·2001

Same author

A browser for expression data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2000

Same author

Exploiting the septum for maximal tip control.

Annals of plastic surgery·2000

Same author

SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database.

Nucleic acids research·1999

Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026

Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026

Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026

Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026

Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026

Same journal

Generalizing the Gaussian Network Model: Spanning-Tree Thermodynamics Shows Entropy-Driven KRAS Activation.

Proteins·2026

See all related articles

Evaluating protein structure predictions is challenging. This new method visually highlights the best predictions from multiple analyses, simplifying assessment for researchers.

Area of Science:

Computational biology
Structural bioinformatics
Protein structure prediction

Background:

Assessing the quality of protein structure predictions is complex due to varying residue completeness and accuracy across different structural regions.
Existing methods often struggle to comprehensively evaluate a large set of predictions against experimental data.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a novel method for evaluating protein structure prediction accuracy.
To visually represent the best results from multiple structural superpositions in a simplified graphical format.

Main Methods:

The study describes a method that analyzes numerous sequence-dependent structural superpositions between predicted and experimental protein structures.
It captures the optimal superposition results and consolidates them into a single graphical representation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

When applied to Comparative Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP2 and CASP3) data, the method visually distinguishes the top-performing predictions.
Manual inspection confirmed that the best predictions were clearly identifiable in most cases.

Conclusions:

The developed graphical method offers a simplified and effective way to evaluate protein structure prediction quality.
This approach aids in visually identifying superior predictions within large datasets, facilitating easier assessment.