Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Saccadic suppression precedes visual motion analysis.

D C Burr1, M J Morgan, M C Morrone

  • 1Istituto di Neurofisiologia del CNR Via S. Zeno 51, Pisa, 56127, Italy. dave@in.pi.cnr.it

Current Biology : CB
|October 26, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Primary visual cortex BOLD responses to relative localization of sounds at 7T.

iScience·2026
Same author

Factors limiting quantitative phase retrieval in atomic-resolution differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy using a segmented detector.

Ultramicroscopy·2022
Same author

Lagged recovery of fish spatial distributions following a cold-water perturbation.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Suppressing dynamical diffraction artefacts in differential phase contrast scanning transmission electron microscopy of long-range electromagnetic fields via precession.

Ultramicroscopy·2020
Same author

Spontaneous perception of numerosity in pre-school children.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2019
Same author

High contrast at low dose using a single, defocussed transmission electron micrograph.

Micron (Oxford, England : 1993)·2019
Same journal

Pitch selectivity in ferret auditory cortex.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

A cell size-dependent competition between geometry and polarity governs nuclear and spindle positioning in early embryos.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Trophic cascades drive sustainability in the agricultural heritage rice-fish coculture system.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Tracking Satb2-positive retinal ganglion cells in zebrafish unveils developmental functional reorganization.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

RhoGAP54D promotes cell size asymmetry and inhibits pulsatile myosin activity in Drosophila neural stem cells.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Increased rates of hybridization in swordtails are associated with water pollution.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Saccadic suppression, which reduces motion perception during eye movements, occurs very early in visual processing. This effect impacts individual visual frames before motion is analyzed, suggesting a fundamental protective mechanism.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Perception of motion is significantly suppressed during saccades (rapid eye movements) to prevent visual disorientation.
  • Previous research suggests saccadic suppression might selectively target the magnocellular visual pathway.
  • Understanding the neural timing of saccadic suppression is crucial for comprehending visual processing limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the precise neural timing of saccadic suppression in relation to motion perception.
  • To determine if saccadic suppression affects individual visual frames or the integrated motion signal.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a two-frame stimulus technique to generate an impression of motion with controlled contrast.
  • Measured motion discrimination thresholds by varying the contrast of a test frame against a fixed-contrast frame.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Triggered the two-frame sequence with voluntary saccades to assess the impact of saccadic suppression.

    • Main Results:

    • Contrast thresholds for motion discrimination were dependent on the fixed-contrast frame, showing a minimum at medium contrast.
    • During saccades, thresholds increased, with effects varying based on the presentation order of the two frames.
    • When the test frame appeared first, sensitivity was generally depressed; when it appeared second, sensitivity could increase.

    Conclusions:

    • Saccadic suppression occurs at a very early stage of visual processing, affecting individual frames before motion analysis.
    • The findings support the hypothesis that saccadic suppression acts on visual input prior to motion integration.
    • This early-stage suppression is likely a fundamental mechanism to mitigate visual disruption during eye movements.