Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using cluster random assignment to measure program impacts. Statistical implications for the evaluation of education

H S Bloom1, J M Bos, S W Lee

  • 1Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, USA. howard_bloom@mdrc.org

Evaluation Review
|November 11, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Practice variation in opioid prescribing for non-cancer pain in Dutch primary care: A retrospective database study.

PloS one·2023
Same author

QTc prolongation during erythromycin used as prokinetic agent in ICU patients.

European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice·2019
Same author

[Proton pump inhibitors: not as safe as they seem].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2016
Same author

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of intensified antiretroviral treatment strategies in HIV/AIDS.

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2009
Same author

The societal burden of HIV/AIDS in Northern Italy: an analysis of costs and quality of life.

AIDS care·2008
Same author

Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in short static and prolonged dynamic contractions at low forces: use of the within-subject's skewness and standard deviation variables.

European journal of applied physiology·2007
Same journal

Brokerage, Gender, and Academic Performance in Interdisciplinary Co-Authorship Networks: A Study of Policy-Related Social Learning Publications.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Peer-led Support Groups for Parents Following Child Removal: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Study.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Teacher-AI Collaboration to Support Assessment and Feedback: A Case Study in Norwegian Secondary Education.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Green Policies for the Circular Economy and Entrepreneurship: International Evidence.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

Transparency, Ethical Framing, and User Agency as Determinants of Trust in AI-Mediated Assessment: Informing the Design of Trustworthy Systems.

Evaluation review·2026
Same journal

No Evidence that Banning the Purchase of Sex Increases Rape: A Replication Study of Ciacci (2024, 2025).

Evaluation review·2026
See all related articles

Randomly assigning groups to programs provides unbiased impact estimates. Cluster assignment, though less powerful than individual assignment, shows promise for evaluating education programs in schools.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Education Policy
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Random assignment is the gold standard for unbiased program impact evaluation.
  • Individual random assignment is often infeasible for group-level interventions.
  • Cluster assignment offers an alternative for evaluating whole-group programs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the statistical implications of cluster assignment for program evaluation.
  • To present an analytic framework for studying cluster assignment issues.
  • To assess the feasibility of cluster assignment for evaluating education programs in schools.

Main Methods:

  • Outlining the issues involved in cluster assignment.
  • Developing an analytic framework for cluster assignment analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the framework to education program evaluation in schools.

    • Main Results:

    • Cluster assignment maintains unbiased impact estimates, similar to individual random assignment.
    • Cluster assignment generally has lower statistical power compared to individual random assignment.
    • The approach shows promise for education program evaluation when controlling for prior student performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Cluster assignment is a viable strategy for estimating program impacts on groups.
    • Statistical power can be enhanced by controlling for historical performance data.
    • This method is particularly relevant for evaluating school-based educational interventions.