Related Experiment Videos

Infantile spasms: hypothesis-driven therapy and pilot human infant experiments using corticotropin-releasing hormone

T Z Baram1, W G Mitchell, K Brunson

  • 1Department of Anatomy/Neurobiology, University of California at Irvine, CA 92697-4475, USA. tallie@uci.edu

Developmental Neuroscience
|November 27, 1999
PubMed

Insights

Alpha-helical CRH, a peptide, did not effectively treat infantile spasms (IS) because it cannot cross the blood-brain barrier. Further research with nonpeptide compounds is needed to block central CRH receptors for potential IS treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroendocrinology
  • Pediatric Neurology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Infantile spasms (IS) are a severe infant seizure disorder often leading to mental retardation.
  • Current treatments like ACTH have significant side effects, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches.
  • The corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) system is implicated in IS pathogenesis, suggesting CRH receptor blockade as a potential treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of alpha-helical CRH, a CRH receptor antagonist, in infants with IS.
  • To investigate the effects of peripheral CRH receptor blockade on autonomic and biochemical parameters.
  • To determine if CRH receptor blockade can ameliorate IS and associated cognitive deficits.

Main Methods:

  • A Phase I trial administering alpha-helical CRH to 6 infants with IS who failed conventional therapy.
  • Monitoring of autonomic parameters (blood pressure, pulse, temperature, respiration).
  • Assessing effects on ACTH, cortisol, electrolytes, and glucose; clinical diaries and video EEG used for efficacy evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Alpha-helical CRH did not alter autonomic or biochemical parameters.
  • Transient reduction in plasma ACTH and cortisol indicated peripheral CRH receptor blockade.
  • No central effects were observed, suggesting the peptide did not cross the blood-brain barrier; resistance to repeat infusion noted.

Conclusions:

  • Peptide CRH analogs do not effectively cross the blood-brain barrier to impact central CRH receptors.
  • Peripheral effects on stress hormones are transient and benign.
  • Nonpeptide compounds capable of CNS penetration are required to test the hypothesis of CRH receptor blockade for IS treatment.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos