Accuracy of clean-catch urine collection in infancy

I J Ramage1, J P Chapman, A S Hollman

  • 1Renal Unit and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow, Scotland.

The Journal of Pediatrics
|December 10, 1999
PubMed

Insights

Clean-catch urine (CCU) collection is accurate for diagnosing urinary tract infections in infants, showing good association with suprapubic aspiration (SPA). This study encourages the use of the less invasive CCU technique.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Microbiology
  • Urology

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in infants is crucial for timely treatment and preventing complications.
  • Traditional urine collection methods in infants can be challenging, with suprapubic aspiration (SPA) considered a gold standard but being invasive.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic accuracy of clean-catch urine (CCU) collection versus suprapubic aspiration (SPA) for detecting significant bacteriuria in infants.
  • To evaluate the success rate of ultrasound-guided SPA compared to non-guided SPA.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective case series involving 49 infants with suspected UTIs.
  • Paired urine cultures were obtained using both CCU and SPA methods.
  • Sensitivity, specificity, and false-positive/negative rates were calculated; SPA success rates with and without ultrasound guidance were compared using chi-squared test.

Main Results:

  • Clean-catch urine collection demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 95.0% for detecting significant bacteriuria.
  • False-positive and false-negative rates for CCU were 5% and 12%, respectively.
  • Ultrasound-assisted SPA had a significantly higher success rate (93%) compared to non-guided SPA (62%).

Conclusions:

  • There is a good association between urine culture results obtained by CCU and SPA in infants.
  • The study supports the use of the clean-catch urine collection technique as a reliable and less invasive method for diagnosing UTIs in this population.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care01:30

Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

A healthcare provider can diagnose a urinary tract infection (UTI) through several methods:Medical History and Symptoms: The provider will take a detailed medical history and ask about symptoms such as frequent urination, burning sensation during urination, and lower abdominal pain.Urinalysis: A clean-catch urine sample is collected in a sterile container and tested for the presence of bacteria, white blood cells (leukocytes), nitrites, blood, and protein. The presence of leukocytes and...
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis01:29

Urine Studies I: Urinalysis

Urinalysis is a widely used diagnostic test that analyzes urine's physical, chemical, and microscopic characteristics. Healthcare providers use it to detect and monitor various health conditions, including renal disease, urinary tract infections (UTIs), diabetes, and metabolic or systemic disorders.Components of UrinalysisUrinalysis consists of three primary components: physical, chemical, and microscopic examination. Each provides unique insights into the urine sample and, by extension, the...
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test01:26

Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test

A urine culture and sensitivity test is a diagnostic procedure used to identify urinary tract bacterial infections and determine the most effective antibiotics for treatment. This test is generally preferred when a patient shows manifestations of a urinary tract infection, such as frequent or painful urination, cloudy or foul-smelling urine, or lower abdominal pain.Purpose of the TestThe primary goals of a urine culture and sensitivity test are to:Determine the specific bacteria causing the...