Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A functional map in rat olfactory epithelium.

J W Scott1, T Brierley

  • 1Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322-3030, USA. johns@cellbio.emory.edu

Chemical Senses
|December 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orbital-flop transition of superfluid <sup>3</sup>He in anisotropic silica aerogel.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Magnetic Susceptibility of Andreev Bound States in Superfluid ^{3}He-B.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Greener residential environment is associated with increased bacterial diversity in outdoor ambient air.

The Science of the total environment·2023
Same author

Embolism of the Pulmonary Artery in a Horse.

The Journal of comparative medicine and veterinary archives·2022
Same author

Effect of Magnetic Impurities on Superfluid ^{3}He.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Non-technical skills of surgeons and anaesthetists in simulated operating theatre crises.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same journal

A method for assessing approach and avoidance behavior across multiple olfactory stimuli in mice including multivariate hypothesis comparisons.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

From Receptors to Behavior: Molecular and Functional Logic of Sensory Coding in the Mouse Accessory Olfactory System.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Vomeronasal sensory input and its social behavioral output.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Reference data for Bayesian adaptive QUEST-based taste recognitions thresholds from pooled individual participant data.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

Expression of Calca gene-derived peptides in the murine taste system.

Chemical senses·2026
Same journal

The trigeminal function questionnaire (TriFunQ): a tool for clinical and research use.

Chemical senses·2026
See all related articles

This study mapped odor responses across rat olfactory epithelium, revealing distinct spatial distributions for different odorant chemicals. These patterns suggest a correlation between odorant response zones and olfactory receptor gene expression.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Olfactory Research
  • Sensory Biology

Background:

  • The olfactory epithelium is responsible for detecting airborne odorants.
  • Understanding the spatial organization of olfactory receptor responses is crucial for deciphering odor perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the spatial distribution of olfactory responses to different odorants across the rat olfactory epithelium.
  • To correlate these response patterns with known olfactory receptor gene expression zones.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous electro-olfactogram (EOG) recordings were performed using multiple electrode arrays.
  • Responses to three terpene odorants (carvone, limonene, 1,8-cineole) were measured across different regions of the exposed olfactory epithelium in post-mortem rats.
  • Odorant application was systematically varied across medial, dorsal, ventral, and lateral aspects of the epithelium.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Distinct spatial response patterns were observed for carvone, limonene, and 1,8-cineole across the olfactory epithelium.
  • Carvone responses were larger dorsally, 1,8-cineole responses peaked in intermediate-ventral regions, and limonene responses varied less but were often larger ventrally.
  • These spatial distributions showed regional variations, particularly on endoturbinate IV, and were consistent across different odor concentrations and anatomical locations.

Conclusions:

  • The spatial distribution of odorant responses in the olfactory epithelium is chemically specific.
  • These findings support the hypothesis that olfactory receptor gene expression is organized spatially, creating functional zones within the epithelium.