Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

A Novel Single Animal Motor Function Tracking System Using Simple, Readily Available Software
Published on: August 31, 2018
Comparison of Two Methods for Judging Distances Near Overhead Power Lines
Daniel Imbeau1, Joseph-Jean Paques2, Sylvie Bergeron1
1a Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières , Canada.
Abstract:
Sixteen certified crane operators performed several series of boom movements toward a segment of a typical power line using a 100-ton lifting capacity crane equipped with an 18-m boom, a single lifting cable, and a hard ball hook. The operators were instructed to stop the crane movement when the lifting cable reached the edge of the danger zone located 3 m from the power line. To achieve each maneuver, they evaluated the distance between the nearest wire and their crane using two methods: free sighting and the use of highly visible markers delineating the edge of the danger zone. The dependent measure was the distance between the lifting cable and the edge of the danger zone. Results showed that operators were generally unreliable when judging the distance between their crane and the power line when sighting the power line directly, but the use of markers proved to be much more precise and reliable in targeting the edge of the danger zone.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission Line Design Considerations
Series Impedances: Three-Phase Line
Using Kirchhoff's laws, an integro-differential equation for the network is derived. This equation accounts for unbalanced phase currents, which may induce return currents through neutral wires and the earth, seeking the least impedance path. Earth return conductors can replace the...
Design Example: Measuring Distance Between Two Points with Obstructions
Differential Leveling
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Arc Length of a Curve: Problem Solving

