Interpersonal violence in a "normal" low-income control group

D Hien1, C Bukszpan

  • 1St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center-The Women's Health Project, New York, NY 10025, USA. Drhien@aol.com

Women & Health
|December 23, 1999
PubMed

This paper examines the rates of interpersonal violence and trauma reported in a sample of 98 urban, low-income women, predominantly Latina or African-American descent constituting a "normal" control group for a larger study on drug abuse and violence. This sample was recruited from the obstetrics-gynecology outpatient clinic at St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center in New York City and carefully screened for the absence of any DSM-IV Axis I psychopathology including major mood disorders, anxiety, psychotic, alcohol and substance use disorders. Consistent with the literature, our sample exhibited rates of interpersonal violence and trauma markedly above estimates for women nationwide; compared to such national figures, our sample was at higher risk for experiencing childhood sexual abuse, childhood physical abuse, and partner violence. Almost one-quarter of our sample met diagnostic criteria for lifetime post-traumatic stress disorder. Ten to twenty percent of our sample reported other kinds of trauma, such as witnessing a murder, seeing violence between her parents, or being homeless. Interestingly, women in our sample were more likely than women nationwide to tell someone else of their abuse or trauma; it may be that disclosure of such events to a supportive person has protected these women to a certain extent from some of the longer-term potential effects of such negative experiences. The data collected in this study underscore the need for mental health and medical professionals to be sensitive to the high prevalence of certain kinds of traumatic and violent experiences in the lives of inner-city, low-income, minority women.

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
Bullying02:04

Bullying

A modern form of aggression is bullying. As you learn in your study of child development, socializing and playing with other children is beneficial for children’s psychological development. However, as you may have experienced as a child, not all play behavior has positive outcomes. Some children are aggressive and want to play roughly. Other children are selfish and do not want to share toys. One form of negative social interactions among children that has become a national concern is bullying.
Impact of Groups on Individuals01:28

Impact of Groups on Individuals

Groups play a fundamental role in shaping individual behavior, as they establish norms that guide interactions and decision-making. Social psychology examines how individuals conform to group expectations, often adjusting their attitudes and actions to align with group norms. These norms can be formal, such as workplace policies, or informal, such as unspoken social expectations within a fraternity.Conformity and Social InfluenceConformity arises when individuals modify their behaviors or...