Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface.

D A Puleo1, A Nanci

  • 1Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0070, USA. puleo@pop.uky.edu

Biomaterials
|December 30, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advances in Controlled Drug Delivery for Treatment of Osteoporosis.

Current osteoporosis reports·2016
Same author

In vitro evaluation of osteoblast responses to carbon nanotube-coated titanium surfaces.

Progress in orthodontics·2016
Same author

Inactivation of the Odontogenic ameloblast-associated gene affects the integrity of the junctional epithelium and gingival healing.

European cells & materials·2015
Same author

Porous PLGA scaffolds for controlled release of naked and polyethyleneimine-complexed DNA.

Biomedical materials (Bristol, England)·2012
Same author

P44-expression pattern of APIN and amelotin during formation and regeneration of the junctional epithelium.

Bulletin du Groupement international pour la recherche scientifique en stomatologie & odontologie·2012
Same author

Development of an injectable two-phase drug delivery system for sequential release of antiresorptive and osteogenic drugs.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2011
Same journal

Oral colon-targeted micro-nano formulation engineered in microfluid for synergistic therapy of inflammatory bowel disease.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Manganese@Gold cluster-coordinated covalent organic frameworks-based artificial metalloenzymes with cascade biocatalysis and amplified systemic stimulation to combat malignant tumor metastasis.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Remodeling TME via feedback-driven photothermal-ferroptosis-immune cascade.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Photodynamic therapy produces enhanced efficacy of antitumor immunotherapy by simultaneously inducing intratumoral release of sorafenib" [Biomaterials 2020, 240, 119845].

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Mg-integrated octopus-inspired hydrogel dressing enables autonomous adhesion and wound closure for enhanced healing via sequential microenvironment regulation.

Biomaterials·2026
Same journal

Engineering miRNA-223 nanocomplexes via bioorthogonal self-assembly for precision therapy of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Biomaterials·2026
See all related articles

Researchers are exploring biomaterial surface modifications to enhance bone healing and osseointegration. Biochemical strategies show promise for controlling the bone-implant interface and improving implant success.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Research
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Current implantology aims to create devices promoting controlled, rapid healing and robust bone integration.
  • Understanding the bone-biomaterial interface is crucial for optimizing osseointegration and implant biomechanics.
  • The bone-implant interface exhibits heterogeneity, often featuring an afibrillar, electron-dense layer rich in specific proteins.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current knowledge on the bone-biomaterial interface.
  • To explore methods for controlling osseointegration, focusing on surface modification strategies.
  • To highlight the potential of biochemical surface modification for guided tissue response.

Main Methods:

  • Review of morphological studies on bone-implant interfaces.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of surface alteration techniques (physicochemical, morphological, biochemical).
  • Focus on immobilizing biomolecules onto implant surfaces to direct cellular and tissue responses.

    • Main Results:

    • The bone-implant interface is heterogeneous, with a consistent afibrillar interfacial zone.
    • This zone is characterized by electron density and enrichment of noncollagenous proteins like osteopontin.
    • Biochemical surface modification is an emerging method with early indications of success in controlling interface events.

    Conclusions:

    • Optimizing osseointegration requires a deeper understanding of the bone-biomaterial interface.
    • Surface modification, particularly biochemical approaches, offers a promising strategy for controlling tissue-implant interactions.
    • Further research into biomolecule immobilization is essential for advancing implantology and achieving predictable clinical outcomes.