Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

19:15
Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Quality evaluation of newborn screening programs
G Loeber1, D Webster, A Aznarez
1National Institute of Public Health, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. gerard.loeber@rivm.nl
Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992). Supplement
|January 8, 2000
Summary
Newborn screening programs vary widely worldwide, with inconsistent quality evaluation across analytical, pre-analytical, and post-analytical phases. This study surveyed global programs to highlight organizational differences and improve future screening practices.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Public Health
- Biochemistry
Background:
- Newborn screening programs have expanded globally over four decades, traditionally focusing on phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism.
- Technological advancements enable screening for a broader range of disorders, yet program scope varies significantly between countries.
- Decision-making for screening protocols is influenced by professional interest, legislation, and funding, leading to disparities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the global landscape of newborn screening programs.
- To identify variations in organization, quality evaluation, and follow-up procedures.
- To provide insights for improving worldwide newborn screening practices.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire was developed and distributed to leading newborn screening centers in over 30 countries.
- Data collected focused on program organization, analytical, pre-analytical, and post-analytical phases.
- Results were analyzed to identify global differences and trends.
Main Results:
- Significant international variations were observed in program organization, turnaround times, coverage completeness, and follow-up.
- Quality evaluation predominantly focused on the laboratory analytical phase, with less attention to pre- and post-analytical stages.
- No correlation was found between screening procedures and the level of legislation or funding systems.
Conclusions:
- Global newborn screening programs exhibit substantial heterogeneity in structure and quality assurance.
- A comprehensive approach to quality evaluation, encompassing all phases, is crucial for effective newborn screening.
- Further research and international collaboration are needed to standardize and optimize newborn screening worldwide.

