Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Implications from factor analysis for central auditory processing disorders.

R L Schow1, G Chermak

  • 1Idaho State University, Pocatello, USA. schorona@isu.edu

American Journal of Audiology
|January 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aural Rehabilitation by ASHA Audiologists: 1980-1990.

American journal of audiology·2015
Same author

A new CAPD battery--multiple auditory processing assessment: factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN.

American journal of audiology·2001
Same author

Central auditory processes and test measures: ASHA 1996 revisited.

American journal of audiology·2001
Same author

Considerations in selecting and validating an adult/elderly hearing screening protocol.

Ear and hearing·1991
Same author

Self-assessment and impairment in adult/elderly hearing screening--recent data and new perspectives.

Ear and hearing·1990
Same author

Hearing screening in a dental office using self-assessment.

Ear and hearing·1990

This study compared two central auditory processing disorder tests in 331 children. Factor analysis revealed two key auditory processing factors, clarifying test usage for diagnosing auditory processing disorders.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology

Background:

  • Central auditory processing disorders (CAPD) present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in school-aged children.
  • Accurate identification of CAPD is crucial for academic and social development.
  • Existing assessment tools require further psychometric validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare findings from the Staggered Spondaic Word (SSW) Test and the SCAN Screening Test for Auditory Processing Disorders.
  • To explore the utility of factor analysis in understanding the underlying processes measured by these CAPD tests.
  • To clarify the specific auditory processing skills assessed by the SSW and SCAN tests.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 331 school-aged children underwent assessment using the SSW Test and the SCAN Screening Test.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Factor analysis was applied to the psychometric data obtained from the tests.
  • Psychometric properties of the SSW and SCAN tests were analyzed and compared.

    • Main Results:

    • Factor analysis identified two significant factors: auditory binaural separation from competition and monaural low redundancy degradation.
    • Results replicated and reinforced previously reported psychometric findings for the SSW and SCAN tests.
    • SSW Left Competing and Right Competing subtests loaded onto a single factor, while SCAN subtests sorted into two factors, not three.

    Conclusions:

    • The identified factors provide a clearer definition of the auditory processes evaluated by the SSW and SCAN tests.
    • Findings enhance the understanding of how these tests assess auditory processing in children.
    • The study clarifies the application of SSW and SCAN tests in diagnosing central auditory processing disorders.