Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On the relative sample size required for multiple comparisons.

J S Witte1, R C Elston, L R Cardon

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland OH 44109-1998, USA. witte@darwin.cwru.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|January 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Disruption of sonic hedgehog signaling in Ellis-van Creveld dwarfism confers protection against bipolar affective disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2014
Same author

Polygenic inheritance of paclitaxel-induced sensory peripheral neuropathy driven by axon outgrowth gene sets in CALGB 40101 (Alliance).

The pharmacogenomics journal·2014
Same author

Hypospadias and variants in genes related to sex hormone biosynthesis and metabolism.

Andrology·2013
Same author

Familial dyslexia: genetic and medical findings in eleven three-generation families.

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

An efficient algorithm to compute the posterior genotypic distribution for every member of a pedigree without loops.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

The finite polygenic mixed model: An alternative formulation for the mixed model of inheritance.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Adjusting for multiple comparisons in genetic and epidemiologic research has limited impact on sample size. Increasing the number of tests linearly scales the required sample size with the logarithm of comparisons.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetic Research
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Multiple comparisons are frequent in epidemiologic and genetic studies.
  • Appropriate statistical adjustment for these comparisons is debated.
  • Maintaining a consistent experimentwise alpha-level is crucial for study validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between the number of comparisons and the required sample size.
  • To clarify the impact of increasing comparisons on statistical power.
  • To provide guidance on sample size calculations in studies with multiple testing.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of sample size requirements.
  • Mathematical demonstration of the effect of comparison number on alpha-level maintenance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Formulation of the relationship between sample size and the logarithm of comparisons.
  • Main Results:

    • Large increases in the number of comparisons have a minimal effect on the necessary sample size.
    • The relative sample size increases linearly with the logarithm of the number of comparisons.
    • This finding simplifies sample size considerations in complex research designs.

    Conclusions:

    • The impact of multiple comparisons on sample size is less pronounced than often assumed.
    • Researchers can maintain experimentwise alpha-levels with manageable sample size increases.
    • This research offers a more practical approach to sample size planning in high-throughput research.