Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parametric analysis for matched pair survival data.

A K Manatunga1, D Oakes

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Emory University School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|January 29, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors related to genetic testing in adults at risk for Huntington disease: the prospective Huntington at-risk observational study (PHAROS).

Clinical genetics·2016
Same author

Antipsychotic drugs cause bradycardia in GD 13 rat embryos in vitro.

Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.)·2012
Same author

Dietary intake in adults at risk for Huntington disease: analysis of PHAROS research participants.

Neurology·2009
Same author

Fatigue in levodopa-naive subjects with Parkinson disease.

Neurology·2008
Same author

Detection of Huntington's disease decades before diagnosis: the Predict-HD study.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2007
Same author

Simple methods for assessing haplotype-environment interactions in case-only and case-control studies.

Genetic epidemiology·2006
Same journal

Shared frailty sieve estimation for dependent left truncated and interval censored data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to: A uniformisation-driven algorithm for inference-related estimation of a phase-type ageing model.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Unobserved heterogeneity in threshold regression based on the hitting times of a reflected Brownian motion for recurrent hypoglycemia.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection with broken adaptive ridge regression for interval-censored competing risks data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
See all related articles

This study applies Hougaard's bivariate Weibull distribution to matched pairs survival data, offering insights into covariate effects and censoring. The random effects model provides a robust analysis for complex survival data, outperforming independence models in specific scenarios.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Matched pairs survival data present unique analytical challenges.
  • Censoring in either or both components of a pair requires specialized statistical methods.
  • Covariate analysis in paired data necessitates accounting for within-pair correlation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply Hougaard's bivariate Weibull distribution with positive stable frailties to matched pairs survival data.
  • To analyze the impact of covariates on survival times in the presence of censoring.
  • To compare the efficiency of a random effects model against a marginal (independence working) model.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Hougaard's bivariate Weibull distribution for correlated survival times.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporating positive stable frailties to model heterogeneity.
  • Applying fixed-effects and marginal (independence working) models for comparison.
  • Estimating regression coefficients and quantifying Fisher information gain.

    • Main Results:

    • The random effects model offers a simple algebraic form with appropriate parameterization.
    • The independence working model performs poorly when within-pair correlation and covariate variability ratios are high.
    • The fixed-effects analysis captures more information under high correlation and specific covariate variability conditions.
    • The choice of model significantly impacts information capture based on correlation and covariate variability.

    Conclusions:

    • Hougaard's bivariate Weibull model provides a flexible framework for matched pairs survival data with censoring.
    • The random effects approach is advantageous in scenarios with high correlation and specific covariate distributions.
    • The study highlights the importance of accounting for correlation in survival analysis.
    • Extensions to Generalized Estimation Equation methodology are indicated.