Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 17, 2026

Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of
I I Iliev1, S Yamachika, K Muta
1Third Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan. d396027h@stcc.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Insights
Dual chamber (DDD) pacing and single chamber atrial (AAI) pacing effects on cardiac performance were compared in patients with first-degree AV block. Optimal AV delay in DDD pacing improved aortic flow, with AAI pacing being superior only when intrinsic AV conduction was significantly prolonged at lower heart rates.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Patients with first-degree AV block often have prolonged intrinsic AV conduction.
- Pacemaker selection (DDD vs. AAI) can influence cardiac performance.
- Optimizing atrioventricular (AV) delay in DDD pacing is crucial for hemodynamic efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of DDD pacing with optimized AV delay versus AAI pacing on systolic and diastolic function in patients with first-degree AV block.
- To evaluate the impact of intrinsic AV conduction time and pacing rate on the relative efficacy of DDD and AAI pacing modes.
Main Methods:
- Seventeen patients with dual-chamber pacemakers and first-degree AV block were studied.
- Doppler echocardiography assessed aortic and mitral flow parameters (AFTVI, MFTVI).
- Comparison of AAI pacing and DDD pacing with individually optimized AV delay at pacing rates of 70/min and 90/min.
Main Results:
- Optimizing AV delay in DDD pacing increased aortic flow time velocity integral (AFTVI) by 16%.
- At 70/min, AAI pacing yielded higher AFTVI than DDD when intrinsic AV conduction was significantly prolonged (Stimulus-R interval > 270 ms).
- At 90/min, DDD pacing demonstrated superior AFTVI compared to AAI pacing; Mitral flow time velocity integral (MFTVI) was generally higher with DDD pacing.
Conclusions:
- In patients with first-degree AV block, the choice between DDD and AAI pacing impacts systolic performance.
- The optimal pacing mode depends on the patient's intrinsic AV conduction time and the pacing rate.
- DDD pacing with optimized AV delay generally offers better hemodynamic performance, particularly at higher pacing rates.
Abstract:
The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of DDD pacing with optimal AV delay and AAI pacing on the systolic and diastolic performance at rest in patients with prolonged intrinsic AV conduction (first-degree AV block). We studied 17 patients (8 men, aged 69 +/- 9 years) with dual chamber pacemakers implanted for sick sinus syndrome in 15 patients and paroxysmal high degree AV block in 2 patients. Aortic flow and mitral flow were evaluated using Doppler echocardiography. Study protocol included the determination of the optimal AV delay in the DDD mode and comparison between AAI and DDD with optimal AV delay for pacing rate 70/min and 90/min. Stimulus-R interval during AAI (ARI) was 282 +/- 68 ms for rate 70/min and 330 +/- 98 ms for rate 90/min (P < 0.01). The optimal AV delay was 159 +/- 22 ms. AV delay optimization resulted in an increase of an aortic flow time velocity integral (AFTVI) of 16% +/- 9%. At rate 70/min the patients with ARI < or = 270 ms had higher AFTVI in AAI than in DDD (0.214 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.196 +/- 0.05 m, P < 0.01), while the patients with ARI > 270 ms demonstrated greater AFTVI under DDD compared to AAI (0.192 +/- 0.03 m vs 0.166 +/- 0.02 m, P < 0.01). At rate 90/min AFTVI was higher during DDD than AAI (0.183 +/- 0.03 m vs 0.162 +/- 0.03 m, P < 0.01). Mitral flow time velocity integral (MFTVI) at rate 70/min was higher in DDD than in AAI (0.189 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.173 +/- 0.05 m, P < 0.01), while at rate 90/min the difference was not significant in favor of DDD (0.149 +/- 0.05 m vs 0.158 +/- 0.04 m). The results suggest that in patients with first-degree AV block the relative impact of DDD and AAI pacing modes on the systolic performance depends on the intrinsic AV conduction time and on pacing rate.
Related Concept Videos
Electrophysiology of Normal Cardiac Rhythm
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Conduction System of the Heart
This system relies on the unique properties of nodal and Purkinje cells:...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...

