Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Noise affects auditory and linguistic processing differently: an MEG study.

C S Herrmann1, U Oertel, Y Wang

  • 1Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany.

Neuroreport
|February 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Theta and alpha oscillatory signatures of auditory sensory and cognitive loads during complex listening.

NeuroImage·2024
Same author

Alpha power during task performance predicts individual language comprehension.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Infant cognition includes the potentially human-unique ability to encode embedding.

Science advances·2018
Same author

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2017
Same author

A revival of Homo loquens as a builder of labeled structures: Neurocognitive considerations.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2017
Same author

Neural networks for harmonic structure in music perception and action.

NeuroImage·2016
Same journal

Electroacupuncture alleviates neuroinflammation and promotes recovery of neurological functions after intracerebral hemorrhage by modulating α7nAChR/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Non-cell-autonomous regulation of Bhlhb5 expression in cortical projection neurons by GABAergic interneuron development and position.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 mediates inflammatory response via NLRP3 inflammasome and neuron damage after traumatic brain injury.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Methyltransferase-like 14 alleviates neuronal ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease by regulating the peroxiredoxin 6/apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 signaling pathway.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Hand mental rotation reaction time reflects motor imagery strategy and predicts changes in finger dexterity after motor imagery.

Neuroreport·2026
Same journal

Functional exploration of metabotropic glycine receptors in cultured rat hippocampal slices.

Neuroreport·2026
See all related articles

Noise disrupts brain processing of spoken language, particularly syntax. Early auditory processing is affected in the right hemisphere, while syntactic processing is generally impaired, with no lateralization.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Auditory Processing

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes spoken language is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Auditory environments often contain background noise, which can impact cognitive functions.
  • Investigating the neural basis of syntactic processing is key to understanding language comprehension.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the effects of background noise on brain activity during the comprehension of spoken sentences.
  • To differentiate the impact of noise on early auditory processing versus higher-level syntactic analysis.
  • To determine the lateralization of noise effects on neural responses to syntactic violations.

Main Methods:

  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to record brain activity in 16 subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects listened to spoken sentences, either in silence or with background noise.
  • Participants judged the syntactic correctness of the presented sentences.

    • Main Results:

    • Background noise differentially affected early auditory and syntactic processing.
    • Noise impacted early auditory processes predominantly in the right hemisphere.
    • Syntactic processing was generally affected by noise, with no significant lateralization.
    • The neural response to syntactic violations (early left anterior negativity) was suppressed by noise.

    Conclusions:

    • Background noise significantly interferes with the neural processing of syntax in spoken language.
    • While early auditory processing shows some hemispheric specificity in noise, syntactic processing is broadly impacted.
    • These findings highlight the detrimental effects of noise on language comprehension and suggest potential targets for intervention.