Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

For whom is the Caesarean section rate high?

R Buist1, J Brown, T McNamara

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Women's Hospital, Auckland.

The New Zealand Medical Journal
|March 4, 2000
PubMed
Summary

A new method for comparing Caesarean section rates was developed. Grouping women by key factors influencing delivery interventions is recommended for hospital audits and benchmarking.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning disabilities. Adapt and survive.

Nursing times·1992
Same author

Intracellular regulation of cell adhesion to extracellular matrix components in murine B16 melanoma cells.

Melanoma research·1992
Same author

The effect of chewing gum use on in situ enamel lesion remineralization.

Journal of dental research·1992
Same author

Pick's disease.

Bailliere's clinical neurology·1992
Same author

A prospective cytogenetic study of 36 cases of DiGeorge syndrome.

American journal of human genetics·1992
Same author

Beliefs and behavioral intentions regarding human immunodeficiency virus testing among New York City runaways.

The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine·1992

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Rising Caesarean section rates are a global concern.
  • Standardized methods are needed to compare Caesarean section rates between hospitals.
  • Casemix adjustment is crucial for accurate comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and evaluate a method for examining and comparing Caesarean section rates.
  • To adjust Caesarean section rates based on patient casemix.
  • To identify factors influencing intervention rates in childbirth.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Caesarean section data from National Women's Hospital in 1997.
  • Two casemix adjustment methods were applied: standard nulliparae and grouping by influencing factors.
  • Comparison of intervention rates (Caesarean section, instrumental vaginal delivery) across different patient groups.

Main Results:

  • The overall Caesarean section rate at National Women's Hospital was 22.3% in 1997.
  • Casemix adjustment using standard nulliparae yielded a rate of 19.2%.
  • Specific patient groups showed significantly different Caesarean section rates, particularly nulliparae undergoing labor induction (26.0%) and women with previous Caesarean sections (36.8%).

Conclusions:

  • A method of grouping women by key factors influencing intervention rates is proposed.
  • This method is recommended for obstetric units for benchmarking and internal audit.
  • Accurate casemix adjustment is essential for meaningful comparison of Caesarean section rates.

Related Experiment Videos