Analyses of quality assessment studies using CD45 for gating lymphocytes for CD3(+)4(+)%

The purpose of this study was to assess whether laboratories which do not use CD45 for gating lymphocytes with three- (or four-) color flow cytometry (non-CD45 laboratories) for CD3(+)4(+)% and CD3(+)8(+)% do worse on quality assessment (QA) studies than laboratories which do use CD45 (CD45 laboratories).

Data came from blood specimens donated by 62 donors (50 HIV-positive) assayed over 2 years (November, 1996-October, 1998) by 35 laboratories in the NIAID DAIDS Flow Cytometry QA Program.

Non-CD45 laboratories were significantly more likely to be classified as having unacceptable inter-laboratory results (far from the group median) than CD45 laboratories (5.6% vs 1.5%, P = 0.005 for CD3(+)4(+)%; 10.4% vs 5.0%, P = 0.007 for CD3(+)8(+)%). The intra-laboratory range of results on blinded replicates was significantly more likely to be deemed unacceptable (range >4%) in non-CD45 laboratories than in CD45 laboratories for CD3(+)8(+)% (14. 5% vs 3.5%, P = 0.002) but not for CD3(+)4(+)% (2.6% vs 1.5%, P = 0. 62). These differences in favor of CD45 gating were observed even though the non-CD45 laboratories had been doing three-color flow cytometry in the QA program significantly longer (P = 0.05) than the CD45 laboratories, and so would be expected to have fewer problems with the assay.

Laboratories which choose to use a single CD3/CD4/CD8 tube for immunophenotyping may be sacrificing both accuracy and reproducibility.