Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantitative endoscopy: initial accuracy measurements.

T O Truitt1, R A Adelman, D H Kelly

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio 45267-0528, USA.

The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology
|February 24, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Status origins, youth rebellion, and delinquency: A reexamination of the class issue.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2014
Same author

Photopic contrast sensitivity without foveal vision.

Optics letters·2009
Same author

Airway injury complicating excision of thyroglossal duct cysts.

International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology·2009
Same author

Lingual hamartoma in an infant: CT and MR imaging.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2007
Same author

Advances in the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary aspiration in children.

The European respiratory journal·2006
Same author

Phenotype and genotype correlations in two best families.

Ophthalmology·2003
Same journal

Laryngeal Injuries Following General Endotracheal Anesthesia: A Case Series.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same journal

Clinical and Voice Outcome Differences in Vocal Cord Cysts with and Without Sulcus Vocalis: Insights From a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same journal

Bioabsorbable Stenting in a Case of Severe Pediatric Posterior Glottic Stenosis.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and Safety of Finafloxacin Otic Suspension, 0.3% for the Treatment of Acute Otitis Externa: Results from two Phase III Randomized Clinical Studies.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same journal

Evaluation Of the Expression Levels Of SerpinB3/B4/B10, Interleukin-17 As Biomarkers For Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
Same journal

Correlation of Patient-Reported Symptoms With Rhinogram Features Beyond Simple Airway Resistance.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2026
See all related articles

This study demonstrates quantitative endoscopy accurately estimates object size from endoscopic images. The technique achieves high accuracy without needing the exact endoscope-to-object distance, only the distance traveled between images.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Optical Engineering
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Accurate object size measurement is crucial in endoscopic procedures.
  • Traditional methods often require known distances, limiting real-time applications.
  • Geometric optics offers a potential solution for distance-independent size estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of a quantitative endoscopy technique for estimating absolute object size.
  • To determine the precision of size measurements using endoscopic images.
  • To assess the feasibility of this method in clinical settings.

Main Methods:

  • A rigid endoscope was calibrated for quantitative measurements.
  • Two endoscopic images were captured with a known distance traveled between them.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Object heights (0.78–11.80 mm) were estimated using geometric optics principles.
  • Measurements were compared against actual object sizes with varying backup distances (5 mm, 10 mm).

    • Main Results:

    • The overall mean percent error in size estimation was 1.12%.
    • Mean errors were 0.76% for 5 mm and 1.65% for 10 mm backup distances.
    • Accuracy was high for both small (<2 mm) and larger (>=2 mm) objects, with mean errors of 0.94% and 1.18%, respectively.
    • Quantitative endoscopy achieved size estimates within 5% of actual object size.

    Conclusions:

    • Quantitative endoscopy provides a highly accurate method for determining absolute object size from endoscopic images.
    • The technique's reliance on traveled distance, not absolute object distance, enhances its practical utility.
    • This promising method can aid in precise surgical assessments and interventions.