Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution of the optimum bidirectional (+/- biphasic) wave for defibrillation.

L A Geddes1, W Havel

  • 1Purdue University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1296, USA.

Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology
|February 26, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Where do ideas come from?

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·2009
Same author

CPR degradation diagram.

Cardiovascular engineering (Dordrecht, Netherlands)·2009
Same author

Principles of exercise responsive pacemakers.

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·2009
Same author

The beginnings of electromedicine.

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·2009
Same author

Retrospectroscope. Discovery of the circulation of blood.

IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society·2008
Same author

How much lung ventilation is obtained with only chest-compression CPR?

Cardiovascular engineering (Dordrecht, Netherlands)·2008

Asymmetric bidirectional waveforms reduce defibrillation energy. The optimal second phase has over a third of the first phase's charge, explained by an ion-flux summation hypothesis.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Monophasic waveforms require higher energy for ventricular defibrillation.
  • Early bidirectional waveforms showed limited improvement over monophasic approaches.
  • The efficacy of biphasic waveforms depends on the characteristics of the second phase.

Observation:

  • The threshold defibrillation energy is minimized when the second, inverted phase's charge is approximately one-third of the first phase's charge.
  • Previous research indicated that a lower amplitude for the second inverted wave is crucial for lowering defibrillation thresholds.
  • The precise mechanism of action for bidirectional waveforms remains unclear.

Findings:

  • Analysis reveals that threshold defibrillation energy is lowest when the charge in the second, inverted phase is slightly more than a third of that in the first phase.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A novel ion-flux, spatial-K+ summation hypothesis is proposed to explain the effect of the second inverted current pulse on myocardial cells.
  • This hypothesis provides a physiological basis for the observed energy reduction with biphasic waveforms.

    • Implications:

    • Understanding the optimal parameters for biphasic waveforms can lead to more effective and less energy-intensive defibrillation devices.
    • The proposed ion-flux summation hypothesis offers a new framework for investigating cardiac electrophysiology during defibrillation.
    • Further research based on this hypothesis could refine defibrillation protocols and improve patient outcomes.