Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?

D G Altman1, P Royston

  • 1ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. altman@icrf.icnet.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|March 1, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

'Allocation concealment': the evolution and adoption of a methodological term.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2018
Same author

[Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2018
Same author

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

Research involvement and engagement·2017
Same author

GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2017
Same author

Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2017
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Prognostic models predict patient outcomes but require validation to ensure accuracy in new patient groups. This study explores statistical and clinical validation methods for these essential medical tools.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Prognostics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Prognostic models are crucial for predicting patient outcomes based on individual and disease factors.
  • These models often exhibit suboptimal performance in real-world clinical settings, necessitating rigorous validation.
  • Established guidelines recommend validating prognostic models using independent patient data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and examine the concept of prognostic model validation.
  • To elucidate the necessity and importance of validating prognostic models in clinical practice.
  • To explore methodologies for assessing both statistical and clinical validity of prognostic models.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and practices in prognostic model validation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual analysis of statistical and clinical validity aspects.
  • Case study illustrations to demonstrate validation principles and challenges.

    • Main Results:

    • Validation ensures prognostic models perform reliably with new patient cohorts.
    • Distinguishes between statistical validity (model's predictive accuracy) and clinical validity (usefulness in decision-making).
    • Highlights the need for a dual approach to comprehensive model assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Prognostic model validation is essential for reliable patient outcome prediction.
    • A thorough validation process must encompass both statistical performance and clinical utility.
    • Case studies underscore the practical application and importance of these validation concepts.