Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology.

E Bagiella1, R P Sloan, D F Heitjan

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. bagiella@biostat.columbia.edu

Psychophysiology
|March 8, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geographic variation and trends in prevalence of obesity among US adolescents, 2016-2021.

Public health·2023
Same author

Quantitative Evaluation of Medial Temporal Lobe Morphology in Children with Febrile Status Epilepticus: Results of the FEBSTAT Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2016
Same author

Determining the effects and challenges of incorporating genetic testing into primary care management of hypertensive patients with African ancestry.

Contemporary clinical trials·2016
Same author

The Impact of EBV Status on Characteristics and Outcomes of Posttransplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorder.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2015
Same author

Effects of aerobic conditioning on cardiovascular sympathetic response to and recovery from challenge.

Psychophysiology·2013
Same author

The association of cardiac vagal control and executive functioning--findings from the MIDUS study.

Journal of psychiatric research·2013
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces mixed-effects models as a superior alternative for analyzing repeated-measures data in Psychophysiology. These models offer better handling of missing data and increased efficiency compared to traditional ANOVA methods.

Area of Science:

  • Psychophysiology
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Current Psychophysiology methods for repeated-measures designs rely on multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) or corrected repeated-measures ANOVA.
  • These traditional methods ensure appropriate Type I error rates under general variance-covariance assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce mixed-effects models as an alternative analytical procedure for repeated-measures data in Psychophysiology.
  • To highlight the advantages of mixed-effects models over traditional ANOVA techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Description of mixed-effects modeling principles.
  • Illustration of mixed-effects model application using a simple example.

Main Results:

  • Mixed-effects models provide a flexible framework for analyzing repeated-measures data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • These models offer enhanced capabilities in handling missing data.
  • Mixed-effects models are more efficient and parsimonious than traditional ANOVA.

    • Conclusions:

    • Mixed-effects models represent a valuable and advantageous alternative for analyzing repeated-measures data in Psychophysiology.
    • The adoption of mixed-effects models can improve the rigor and efficiency of statistical analyses in the field.