Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference with cardiac pacing.

S L Pinski1, R G Trohman

  • 1Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, USA. spinski@rush.edu

Cardiology Clinics
|March 10, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implantable device therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias: ready for prime time?

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2002
Same author

Advances in cardiac electrophysiology and pacing.

Critical care clinics·2001
Same author

2:1 tracking of sinus rhythm in a patient with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator: what is the mechanism?

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2001
Same author

Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial.

Circulation·2001
Same author

Inactivation of a ventricular tachycardia preventive algorithm during automatic mode switching for atrial tachyarrhythmia.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2001
Same author

The right ventricular tachycardias.

Journal of electrocardiology·2001
Same journal

At the Edge of the Possible: A New Standard for Cardiovascular Critical Care.

Cardiology clinics·2026
Same journal

End-of-Life Care in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.

Cardiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Strategies to Reduce Failure to Rescue after Cardiac Surgery.

Cardiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Embracing Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Program.

Cardiology clinics·2026
Same journal

Post-Heart Transplantation Intensive Care Unit Recovery: A Phase-Based Approach.

Cardiology clinics·2026
Same journal

A Practical Guide to Intensive Care Unit Management after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Cardiology clinics·2026
See all related articles

Transient electromagnetic interference is generally safe for pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients. However, prolonged exposure or specific procedures like MR imaging pose risks, necessitating precautions and further research.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for managing cardiac arrhythmias.
  • Patients with these devices may be vulnerable to electromagnetic interference (EMI).
  • Understanding EMI risks is vital for patient safety and device function.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety of various electromagnetic interference sources for patients with pacemakers and ICDs.
  • To outline precautions for minimizing risks associated with EMI.
  • To identify procedures that remain contraindicated for patients with cardiac electronic devices.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on electromagnetic interference and cardiac electronic devices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of safety data for common EMI sources like wireless phones and antitheft systems.
  • Assessment of risks associated with specific medical procedures such as radiofrequency ablation and MR imaging.

    • Main Results:

    • Most short-term EMI exposures do not threaten patients with pacemakers or ICDs.
    • Prolonged EMI can be dangerous for pacemaker-dependent individuals.
    • Wireless phones and antitheft systems are safe with proper precautions.
    • Radiofrequency ablation necessitates temporary pacing.
    • MR imaging is currently contraindicated for patients with these devices.

    Conclusions:

    • While many EMI sources are safe, prolonged exposure and certain procedures pose significant risks.
    • Adherence to safety precautions is essential when patients with pacemakers/ICDs encounter potential EMI.
    • Further research is required to determine the safety of MR imaging in patients with cardiac electronic devices.