Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

In defense of representation.

A B Markman1, E Dietrich

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712, USA. markman@psy.utexas.edu

Cognitive Psychology
|March 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overview of dermatologic tele-expertise in areas of low physician density: A retrospective study at Le Mans general hospital.

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2023
Same author

Etiological diagnosis of macroglossia: Systematic review and diagnostic algorithm.

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2022
Same author

Benefits of simulation using standardized patients for training dermatology residents in breaking bad news.

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2021
Same author

Validation of a new in vitro Sun Protection Factor method to include a wide range of sunscreen product emulsion types.

International journal of cosmetic science·2020
Same author

Anti-inflammatory / anti-oxidant activity of ingredients of sunscreen products? Implications for SPF.

International journal of cosmetic science·2019
Same author

Validation of an in vitro sun protection factor (SPF) method in blinded ring-testing.

International journal of cosmetic science·2018
Same journal

Sublexical semantic decoding during incidental novel word learning in natural Chinese reading.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Network analyses identify critical factors for facilitating future-oriented decision-making" [Cogn. Psychol. 165 (2026) 101815].

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same journal

The time course of local coherence effects in German: Evidence from self-paced reading times and event-related potentials.

Cognitive psychology·2026
See all related articles

Cognitive science debates computational paradigms by examining representations. The study finds issues stem from specific representation properties, not the concept itself, suggesting internal mediating states are key.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • The computational paradigm has dominated cognitive science and AI since the cognitive revolution.
  • Recent debates question this paradigm, focusing on the concept of representation rather than computation itself.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze objections to representation in cognitive science.
  • To clarify that issues arise from specific properties of representations, not the core idea.
  • To identify a superordinate category of internal information-carrying states mediating cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of objections to the notion of representation in psychological theories.
  • Examination of five properties that can be attributed to mediating states.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of the importance of these properties in various cognitive models.

    • Main Results:

    • Objections to representation are tied to specific properties, not the fundamental concept.
    • All theorists acknowledge internal information-carrying states that mediate cognitive processing.
    • These mediating states form a superordinate category of representations.

    Conclusions:

    • The debate over representation in cognitive science can be reframed by focusing on specific properties.
    • Internal mediating states are a crucial, universally accepted component of cognitive processing.
    • Methodological lessons are drawn to guide future research in cognitive modeling.