Related Experiment Videos
The word-length effect and disyllabic words
P Lovatt1, S E Avons, J Masterson
1University of Essex, U.K. PJL31@cam.ac.uk
Summary
Short words are not reliably better recalled than long words in memory span tasks. This challenges theories linking memory capacity to word duration or phonological decay rates.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- The word-length effect suggests shorter words are recalled better in memory span tasks.
- Previous research often used word sets with uncontrolled differences, potentially confounding results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reliable effect of spoken word duration on immediate serial recall of disyllabic words.
- To test whether previous findings of a word-length effect in disyllables were due to uncontrolled item differences.
Main Methods:
- Compared immediate serial recall of long- and short-duration disyllabic words across three experiments.
- Controlled for word frequency, familiarity, phonological similarity, phoneme count, and semantic associations.
- Utilized auditory/visual presentation and spoken/picture-pointing recall measures.
Main Results:
- Experiments 1a and 1b showed better recall for long words.
- Experiments 2a and 2b found no difference in recall between long and short words.
- Experiment 3 replicated a prior finding of better short-word recall, but only with the original word set.
Conclusions:
- There is no consistent advantage for short-duration disyllables in memory span tasks.
- Previous word-length effect findings may stem from accidental item differences, not duration itself.
- The results question theories attributing memory span capacity to item duration or phonological decay rates.