Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interference from multi-dimensional objects during feature and conjunction discriminations.

L R Fournier1, C Bowd, R J Herbert

  • 1Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman 99164-4820, USA. fournier@wsunix.wsu.edu

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|March 16, 2000
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pandemic impacts and experiences after disaster in Australia: qualitative study of compound impacts following the Black Summer bushfires.

BJPsych open·2024
Same author

Pattern electroretinogram association with spectral domain-OCT structural measurements in glaucoma.

Eye (London, England)·2010
Same author

Agreement between Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-I and -II in detecting glaucomatous changes using topographic change analysis.

Eye (London, England)·2010
Same author

Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2009
Same author

Evaluating the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. I: Clinical examination and photographic methods.

Seminars in ophthalmology·2007
Same author

Evaluating the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. II: Optical image analysis.

Seminars in ophthalmology·2007
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

Distractor interference in visual attention depends on distractor features and task goals. Priming effects occur for task-relevant features, whether attended or ignored, influencing decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Information Processing

Background:

  • Understanding visual attention is crucial for explaining how individuals process information.
  • Feature integration and response selection models are key frameworks in visual attention research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate feature discrimination performance under conditions of attentional focus and distractor interference.
  • To determine the factors influencing interference from multi-dimensional distractors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a two-choice, response compatibility paradigm.
  • Examined feature discrimination within an attended object.
  • Assessed interference from irrelevant, multi-dimensional objects (distractors).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Distractor interference was influenced by distractor feature discriminability, number, and goal-matching.
  • Additive priming effects were observed for multiple task-relevant features, regardless of object attention.
  • Findings support models where features asynchronously prime responses.

Conclusions:

  • Distractor interference is modulated by specific feature characteristics and their relevance to task goals.
  • Asynchronous feature priming and response criterion models can explain observed interference patterns.
  • Results have implications for feature integration, template, and response selection models in visual attention.