Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Laparoscopic Repair of Para-Esophageal Hernia Using Absorbable Biosynthetic Mesh
Published on: September 11, 2021
Management of spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus
Shenfine1, Dresner, Vishwanath
1Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract:
AIMS: Spontaneous rupture of the oesophagus (SRO) is a rare and often fatal event. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presentation, management and outcome of SRO in a single unit. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients presenting with SRO over a 5-year period with respect to presenting features, diagnostic investigations and subsequent management. Statistical analysis was by Student's t test, chi2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified, 12 men and two women with a median age of 64 (range 18-78) years; eight were tertiary referrals. Thirteen of 14 patients presented with chest or upper abdominal pain following vomiting or retching and 13 had an abnormal initial chest radiograph; only one presented with Mackler's triad of pain, vomiting and surgical emphysema. The median delay to diagnosis was 21 (range 1-84) h; this delay did not significantly affect outcome (P = 0.16). An endoscopic assessment and contrast swallow were performed in all patients. Nine of ten patients with a demonstrable leak and full-thickness tear were managed surgically and the four patients with no leak were managed conservatively (P = 0.005); surgical management consisted of thoracotomy, lavage, repair of the perforation and a feeding jejunostomy. Seven patients had a repair over a T tube and two had a primary repair. All conservatively managed patients had contained, controlled or intramural perforations and two also required a feeding jejunostomy. Patients requiring surgery had a longer hospital stay (mean(s.d.) 57.9(34.8) versus 22.2(30.7) days; P = 0.081) and a significantly longer intensive care unit stay (P = 0.044). The overall mortality rate from SRO was 14 per cent (two patients); no deaths occurred in the conservatively managed group. CONCLUSIONS: SRO continues to be diagnosed late despite a classical history and/or abnormal chest radiograph. Endoscopic assessment of perforations is safe and in combination with a contrast swallow can confidently predict patients with contained or controlled rupture in whom non-operative management is successful.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease

